User talk:Frabotti

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riccardo Stefanelli (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Param Mudgal was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Riccardo Stefanelli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Param Mudgal ^talk? 13:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Frabotti, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Param Mudgal ^talk? 13:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Frabot, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Riccardo Stefanelli concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Riccardo Stefanelli, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Riccardo Stefanelli

Hello, Frabot. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Riccardo Stefanelli".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Riccardo Stefanelli}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frabotti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because of my nickname, Frabot, which is actually coming from my name, Francesco, and surname, Bottigliero. I personally consider very superficial blocking a nickname because it sounds like a bot. Can you imagine how many million person around the world have a surname that includes the three letters "bot" in sequence in their surnames (or even names)?

Decline reason:

Wikipedia uses the naming convention that names ending in "bot" represent automated accounts, as opposed to accounts operated manually by human beings. That means that allowing other accounts to end in "bot" would be likely to mislead other editors, and therefore policy does not allow it. How many people have names containing the sequence of letters "bot" is irrelevant, because none of those people is obliged to use that sequence as the last three letters of their user name. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Frabotti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Frabotti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Accept reason:

Perfect! That username will work! Accepting unblock request so that the user can change their username. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions for how to request a change of user name are at Wikipedia:Changing username, but I have contacted a renamer directly and asked him to rename your account, as that will save you a little trouble. However, you are perfectly free to make a request by following the instructions on that page if he doesn't do the renaming soon. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, no need to do any of that, I've done the rename. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need for a reliable source

I have been unable to find a reliable source to indicate one way or the other whether the Oscar nomination for the screenplay of "Roma Città Aperta" was in the "adapted" or "original" category. I did, however, find numerous sources which I would not regard as reliable but which all said that it was adapted, and none saying it was original. Can you point to a reliable source which says that it was original? In your edit summary you mention a Wikipedia article, which does indeed refer to "la migliore sceneggiatura originale", but obviously Wikipedia cannot be regarded as a reliable source to justify inclusion of content in Wikipedia. I tried checking the sources cited in the Italian Wikipedia article in the hope of finding something, but it turned out that that article is appallingly badly sourced, with one of the references I checked being a wiki, some of them not even mentioning the film, and at least one merely including its title in a list. None of the four sources cited at the end of the paragraph mentioning the Oscar nomination says anything about that nomination at all. (And indeed only of the four so much as mentions the film.) It seems to me that you may well be right, but we could really do with a reliable source that says so. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Frabotti (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC) I'll make some more researches on this. Unfortunately Treccani's encyclopaedia is not providing any clear information. I'll check on this https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il_Mereghetti. Many thanks Frabotti (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]