User talk:Fplay

No content in Category:Images of MEPs from Hungary, 6th term

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Images of MEPs from Hungary, 6th term, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Images of MEPs from Hungary, 6th term has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Images of MEPs from Hungary, 6th term, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Images of MEPs from Denmark, 6th term

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Images of MEPs from Denmark, 6th term, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Images of MEPs from Denmark, 6th term has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Images of MEPs from Denmark, 6th term, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Isobel (framework)

Isobel (framework), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Isobel (framework) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isobel (framework) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Isobel (framework) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 17:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:MelbPremiumStation

A tag has been placed on Template:MelbPremiumStation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of controversial books

I have nominated List of controversial books, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of controversial books. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ogg files by Halibutt nominated for deletion

Hello, I've nominated Category:Ogg files by Halibutt, a category you created, for deletion. You may comment in the discussion, which can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 September 17#Category:Ogg files by Wikipedians. — ξ ^xplicit 06:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Tick

Category:The Tick, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Arecibo message diameter3.png

The file File:Arecibo message diameter3.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]