User talk:Fpetes

October 2010

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:Mike Cox. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HOGWASH! You are a biased republican bully Fpetes (talk) 18:52, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Mike Cox, you may be blocked for vandalism. Dave Dial (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Less Hogwash, but bullying threats nevertheless. Comments restored. Fpetes (talk) 18:52, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Talk:Mike Cox, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dave Dial (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok...

1. Your edits on the article and article talk page violate our policy on biographical articles, our policy requiring verifiable sources for content, our policy on reliable sources, and our core value and policy requiring neutral point of view. This has to stop. Please read our core values and the policies listed here and comply with them going forwards.

2. Your threats to User:DD2K violated our policy against making personal attacks. He's not trying to censor you - he's trying to uphold Wikipedia standard policy.

3. The combination of the two issues above puts you right on the edge of being blocked from editing to protect the encyclopedia and its content and its other contributors. I am not going to do so at this instant, but you have zero leash left - any more abuse of editors or policy violations on articles and you will be blocked. New users are not expected to know everything about Wikipedia policy from the beginning, but you've come in and abused the article, people, and our policy very badly. This has to stop immediately.

You are welcome to keep participating in a polite and constructive manner. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder

Under normal circumstances you are not supposed to remove other people's comments from anywhere, your own talk page notwithstanding. If you don't like what they said, you can reply to them; removing them is a big no-no. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 21:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]