User talk:FoxyB

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Reese Witherspoon. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jo Russell. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hughpugh 14:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

HUGHPUGH - HOW CAN I CONTACT YOU. I REPRESENT JO RUSSELL AND THAT IS WHY I AM CHANGING HER WIKI PAGE BECAUSE YOU ARE ALTERING IT WITH FACTS WE DON'T WANT ON THERE AND YOUR INFO IS WRONG - HOW DO I CONTACT YOU

Hello FoxyB. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jo Russell, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add to what Orange Mike said: You seem to have a misconception that because you represent Jo Russell, you have a special right to edit the page about her. On the contrary, your representation gives you if anything less right to edit the page, for it means you have a conflict of interest with regard to the page: your interest in making your client look good runs counter to Wikipedia's interest in making a neutral article. —teb728 t c 02:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but NO_ONE will tell me what is wrong with our version. Hughpugh's version is littered with ERRORS which should not be on.. Mine is COMPLETELY FACTUAL but is not allowed on wiki. Can someone please tell me how to find out what is wrong with my version. Which bits? and why Hughpugh who knows nothing about my client, is allowed to type any old rubbish and completely delete the facts?FoxyB (talk) 07:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hughpugh is not the only other editor of the article. I would suggest that you discuss the changes you want to make at Talk:Jo Russell, identifying what you want to change and why. If I understand correctly, you have three kinds of changes: facts you want to add, info which you say is wrong, and “FACTS WE DON'T WANT ON THERE” (as you say above (please excuse my repetition of your rude use of all caps)). —teb728 t c 08:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]