User talk:Fox002801

Welcome

Hello, Fox002801, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Proposed deletion of Cox's Bazar Govt. High School

Hello, Fox002801. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cox's Bazar Govt. High School, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 22:53, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cox's Bazar Govt. High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cox's Bazar Govt. High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cox's Bazar Govt. High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 22:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cox's Bazar Govt. High School. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 04:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Cox's Bazar Govt. High School. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Cox's Bazar Govt. High School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fox002801, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Fox002801! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mahmudur Rahman, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mahmudur Rahman with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mahmudur Rahman with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fox002801 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I put the truth in an article. But this truth was conflicted to many people. As a result i blocked. If I am unblocked I wil not participate this kind of controversial article

Decline reason:

It was blatant disruptive vandalism, and you're not getting unblocked while you're denying it -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.