User talk:Four legged demon
Well Nathan i guess I am sorry I am sorry for sadisticly attacking you for my own fun i am sorry for personally attacking you and i am sorry for anything i have done to you i owe it to you i apologise for anything i have done to you. Now i reform i make a vow not to vandalise wikipedia in my lifetime ever again i make a commitment to NEVER AGAIN PERSONALLY ATACK ANYONE OR VANDALISE. i commit myself to the benefit of wikipedia.please get me unblocked. Four legged demon 06:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I will bring this to the attention of an admin. The final decision is left to them. Please don't use sockpuppets to evade blocks, to harass others, etc. Doing so will only make matters worse for you in the long run. Also, it's beyond the bounds of what is decent to attack someone you don't even know, realise that there's a human being at the other end. How would you like to be attacked by some anonymous person? — Nathan (talk) / 00:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thank you sir for all of this Four legged demon 02:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- What might also be considered a show of good faith to the admins would be to publicly disclose all the sockpuppets you've been using (unless this is the only one). Cheers. — Nathan (talk) / 05:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
these are all my sockpuppets Four legged demon 17:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
ok then 1.Taracka 2.Dragon Emperor 3.vupolitwit 4.Creami 5.Tojira Ikonoka 6.Tojirra Ikonoka 7.Ki user 8.Huyiop 9.Guldo 10.The evil of squad 11.the return of squad 12.squad 13.Lopikini 14.omechanazatorialo airline 15.metam 16.radoricono 17.star wars 18.peter popi 19.Nathan Lightmooner 20.Count dictator 21.Dr.Septimus 22.the squad 23.Jim Alans 24.Sutle 25.Dragonetti 26. Potaru 27.Pouytrde 28.Polar ice 29.The morning sage 30.Juskar 31.The man of might 32.Farikarnika 33.Bakuhatsuha 34.Dumpkin the kiu 35.Zerbon 36.Vundai 37.God 38.Jesus Christ 39.Adminship for good jimbo anal fuck and suck 40.Block me please 41.Damn Curps
iv been using all kinds of them and here they all are Four legged demon 22:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nathan has asked me to take a look at your case. I am very doubtful that unblocking you would be beneficial to Wikipedia, considering the damage you've done in the past, if all these socks are use. Just out of curiosity, if someone would unblock you, what kind of contributions could we expect from you? --JoanneB 07:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I would make vandal fighting activities and contribute to articles about as much as i could. i would battle trolls and hammer personal attackars. i would work selflessly to improve wikipedia.i would let you know what my username refers to.i would be eternally grateful to wikipedia. i would never do anything against it.i would help wikipedia to rid itself of the worst vandals out there. i can be a good user if only given my chance. to base yourself on those edits i made is to live in the past and thus is counter productive to any attempt to improve something.wrong can become right if allowed a chance at redemption Four legged demon 22:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, you haven't gotten all your sockpuppets blocked, so why not use one of those to prove that you really make valuable contributions and are able to stay out of trouble? You can accuse us of living in the past all you want, but I'd rather call it 'learning from past experience'. You state that you could be a good user 'if only given my chance' - it looks up there like you took 41 of those chances - so I don't see why you'd get another one right now, sorry. --JoanneB 07:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)