User talk:Foundingheritage

CS1 error on Erick Jones

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Erick Jones, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Erick Jones, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There currently posted on the living person's webpage is incorrect. There are also invalidated references that have been used on the page that need to be removed. Foundingheritage (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This will be included in the edit summary. Foundingheritage (talk) 08:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My strong advice: don't edit the article again at this point, instead discuss your proposed changes on the talk page. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Synorem (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Erick Jones. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Erick Jones shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erick Jones

Hello, Foundingheritage. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Erick Jones, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 22:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]