User talk:Forward umbrella 2024

September 2024

Your recent editing history at Laura Winter shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Seriously: stop. I will block you if you continue to insert this irrelevant, poorly written, unclear, and improperly verified material in that article. Drmies (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Laura Winter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acroterion, should this material be revdeleted? It was so dense I couldn't rightly tell. Drmies (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To the extent it was comprehensible, it appears to be accusations of illegal conduct ... of some sort. So yes, I think so. Acroterion (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh yes people have to know Forward umbrella 2024 (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you even comprehend unfair commercial practices? Forward umbrella 2024 (talk) 00:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is not defamatory. you obviously do not know the law. you are a joke Forward umbrella 2024 (talk) 00:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could have helped your case, perhaps, by writing like a grown-up, in proper, more formal English. What you wrote up in the article was already dense and practically incomprehensible, and you weren't doing better on the talk page either ("lol"). This is extra important since Acroterion has removed your edits from the history, because they violated a core rule here: WP:BLP, so please take this more seriously. And "legal inside info", which you mentioned on the talk page, is by definition not acceptable here: you'll see there that I said "You would need reliable, independent, secondary sources". 00:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 00:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Forward umbrella 2024 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Info are public ref barred @+brand winter content does and I had sourced them: guidance, consumer protrction etc. I was in the process to upload incriminating content as images against Winter and I was in touch direct with asa for both bravo and mackintosh Forward umbrella 2024 (talk) 00:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In as much as this is comprehensible it only demonstrates how far the editor is from a proper understanding of our BLP policy and, in general, how Wikipedia works. Drmies (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.