User talk:Foristslow

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

You haven't said what accounts are involved, so what do expect anyone to do about them?
You have posted about this in several places. Please see WP:FORUMSHOP.
As you have already been told by an administrator, you have not made a case for any abuse. JBW (talk) 10:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, To answer your first question when and where is it appropriate to mention the accounts involved. Regards Foristslow (talk) 10:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nondualism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 09:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

apologies it seems that it is hard to find a reference in english for my edits.I meant to come back and delete them myself.Thankyou for your time Foristslow (talk) 11:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Intersectionality has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of text copied directly from UC Berkeley without explicitly crediting the source may also have been a violation of Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Please remember to always use quotation marks or a template such as {{blockquote}} for any direct quotations. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The cite you just added to Intersectionality seems fine to me because its content supports the text of the article. Not because "An award for one is an award for all." - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhidharma

You have reached WP:3RR at Bodhidharma. Please stop your WP:DISRUPTIVE point of view-pushing; your edits contain usourced material, factual incorrect statements, and grammatical errors. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bodhidharma, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 18:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to Buddhabhadra (translator) seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Bátuó is Buddhabhadra the Shaolin abbot, not Buddhabhadra (translator) . Please see also WP:INTEGRITY and [1]. JimRenge (talk) 06:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Apologies for my harsh responses and criticisms; some of your edits really didn't make sense (Bodhidharma regarded as the founder op Chan-Buddhism in pop-culture, while this is a basic origins-story of the Chan-tradition itself), but I do understand now that your intentions are sincere, and that there are some obstacles with regard to cross-lingual subtleties. As I wrote on one of the talkpages. John Mcrae's Seeing Through Zenis really recommendable to read. Also Morton Schlutter How Zen Became Zen is very informative. John McRae is easier to read, but both are very good. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you're kind words Jonathan,My feeling is that robust enthusiastic dialogue is very important. Remembering to keep your equinimity so we can get to the truth. I am still not convinced that the history is correct. But we can work to some common ground through looking through the reference material, thank you once again. 🙏🏼 Foristslow (talk) 21:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Foristslow! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Page protection on Bodhidharma, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]