User talk:Foreverprovence

Hello, Foreverprovence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Josette (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Al Capone, you will be blocked from editing. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 06:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Only if they meet our reliable sources policy.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 07:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 02:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One-club men

Please refrain from adding players to the List of one-club men who do not qualify. As the opening states:

"A one-club man is a term used to describe a football player who has played his entire professional career with only one club."

So players such as Gareth Barry and Nigel Spink clearly do not meet the criteria. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 23:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Barton / February 29

Hi, you can't simultaneously add something to two articles and then cite the other article as the source. It needs to come from a reliable, third part source, not Wikipedia. Emma Barton's date of birth is disputed, and 1977 was not a leap year, so had no February 29. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just noticed you didn't add her to the February 29 article, just changed the year. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Stanley Cup playoffs

Bold indicates players and goaltenders whose teams are still in the playoffs. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Stone Roses discography

I have reverted your recent edit to the Stone Roses discography since the date you added is unverified. If you do have a reliable source for the date then please do provide it for the article. Longwayround (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I've reverted your recent changes to the Stone Roses articles since there is suspicion that the sources you quote may well have gleaned their information from this very site! WP:CIRCULAR WP:SOURCES

Longwayround (talk) 09:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Wichita Massacre. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 07:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]