User talk:ForemostExpertonAllThingsCocktails
ForemostExpertonAllThingsCocktails (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't vandalize pages, I don't edit war, I don't do any of that stupid stuff. Yall just keep blocking and banning me for ban evasion, but that's like all your doing. Im not actually doing anything, and if I remember correctly, the last time I was banned I was talking on TALK PAGES, and you were deleting my entries. All I want to do is add references, that's it. Just old historical data that you don't have listed that is very important given every single thing you have about drinks on Wikipedia is wrong, every single page. Im not going to get into you guys stealing my work, because I was there when they helped use my references, without crediting me for finding them. You did it with the bloody mary 1941 reference, did it with the 75, 1913 reference, you did it with the mint julep 1724 reference, you did it on a lot of pages. I forgive you for stealing my work and not giving credit where credit is due. I just would want to point out that even on the old fashion page the #19th REFERENCE THAT IS CURRENTLY LISTED, list "brandy old fashion" as a recipe. Ive read so much on cocktails and cocktail history I can you YOUR REFERENCES to PROVE MY POINT! There are many more references that prove this very point, but you guys keep deleting them even when its on talk pages. GET REAL. AND STOP WITH THE WONDRICH LOVING. I can not even believe you would rather believe heresay bs, and it is heresay read his article like "ginger being stuck up a horses rear" as the actual origin of the cocktail, OVER MY LITERATURE which suggest it was the virginia port bill of 1784, shortly after the repeal of 1783, which banned all imports, that allowed the first 6 cocktail horses to be shipped over, two of which were owned by the lairds, who also owned applejack brandy. YOU CANT BE SERIOUS?! Now do you see why I am so upset, I ACTUALLY KNOW THE TRUE HISTORY AND ORIGIN OF THE COCKTAIL AND OLD FASHION AND THE CURRENT THEORY IS GINGER IN THE REAR OF A HORSE? GTFO. If you believe that, then don't even bother unbanning, you are seriously mentally handicapped. Or you can realize im just trying to inform you on what I KNOW. ITS SO FUNNY you guys are always like YOU CANT USE SELF PUBLISHED BOOKS. FINE! BUT UNDERSTAND I HAVE WRITTEN 72! and I USED THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS OF COCKTAIL GUIDES FROM 1522 - today to compose those books! SO I HAVE THE ACTUAL REFERENCES, AS I POINTED OUT EARLIER YOU ALREADY STOLE. NOW I HAVE GIVEN IT 6 MONTHS, I shown no malice, no vandalism no sockpuppetry, like come on, its obvious I don't have bad intentions. Ill even ask the teahouse whatever for help
Decline reason:
You are banned from Wikipedia and may not edit under any account. Yunshui 雲水 08:20, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unban | reason=because its not necessary. I shouldn't have to explain more, I don't do things that warrant a ban. Literally, I am banned for block evading 6 months ago. Let it go, just let me come back and edit constructively.ForemostExpertonAllThingsCocktails (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)}}
You are evading the block with this very unban request. In creating this account, you have reset the clock so that the absolute earliest an unban would even be put before the community for consideration is now pretty much Christmas. Any appeal needs to be made from your original account in any case; appeals from sockpuppet accounts such as this one will be rejected out of hand. Yunshui 雲水 14:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.