User talk:Foolmati

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Girija Prasad Koirala‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaurav rajbhandari

A tag has been placed on Gaurav rajbhandari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Momo san ^Gespräch 01:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Gaurav rajbhandari. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Momo san ^Gespräch 01:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ShriKrishna Shrestha

The article ShriKrishna Shrestha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, no RS cited. Asserts notability so can't speedy.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Basket of Puppies 19:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:Metropolitan90. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Catgut (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Method Man discography. Catgut (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]