User talk:Foo39
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Foo39, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quis separabit? 02:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Foo39. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I-80 Rape Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SCSD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Support
[edit]Greetings my friend your edits goes good keep making more pages & traduction pages 👍 Fortnitelover (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Jane Placide) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Jane Placide, Foo39!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
What were the circumstances of her death?
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Ham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ann Pennington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Content improvement on [[Ujjawal Krishnam]
Relevant personality agrees to share his image and others contents for page improvement. As you upload media files, please do contact the person to get license on his photo at ujju-phy@msubaroda.ac.in
Person is also a researcher and has some publications as Google Scholar lists, there is a need of stub to be added for image, nationality, birthplace etc. See to it. AchaksurvisayaUdvejin (talk) 06:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Ujjawal Krishnam for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ujjawal Krishnam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ujjawal Krishnam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matt 190417 (talk) 12:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Foo39. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Murder of Cécile Bloch
[edit]I believe this should really be under a different title and that the other murders linked to this case should be merged into one article. Govvy (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Murder of Cécile Bloch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tragic, but not notable. Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 14:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Murder of Cécile Bloch for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Cécile Bloch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Cécile Bloch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 15:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)