User talk:Fn1m

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Fn1m! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 18:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Citing sources Neutral Point of View Describing points of view Attribution Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Etiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Resolving disputes
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Tools Village pump

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ferrari has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Queen

There is a thread for this on the talk page, if you have reliable third party sources for the information you include, you should take up the issue there. You also appear to be deleting sources to include your view, this is not acceptable, please desist in doing this, again, take it up on the talk page.--Alf ^melmac 22:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Macedonia, you will be blocked from editing. Grsz¹¹ 20:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:JorgeCampos.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JorgeCampos.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Campos1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Campos1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Figuring 2002 and 2006 World Cup performance into 2010 WC Seeding

Why do you keep deleting that? It's highly probable. If it wasn't, more people would be projecting the Netherlands as a seeded team. You need to put it back Purplebackpack89 (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of prior performance in World Cups isn't just wrong, it's edit warring and vandalism. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Removal of noncontroversial material content is inappropriate; as notified you can tag content that needs citation. Edit warring to keep noncontroversial material removed is disruptive, and since you have continued past warnings I have blocked you for 24 hours. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fn1m (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ι incorrectly delete an edit because I didn't knew that I could use ^{[citation needed]}

Decline reason:

AS noted in the block message you ignored warnings about this. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Aris Thessaloniki F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Dog poster 22:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Frame Tour

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Broken Frame Tour, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: A Broken Frame Tour. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Republic of Macedonia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wayne Olajuwon chat 14:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Republic of Macedonia. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. George2001hi (Discussion) 14:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you move a page maliciously, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Under the terms of WP:ARBMAC, you are banned from editing all articles, templates, images etc that relate to the Republic of Macedonia. This is due to your recent page-move disruption and previous vandalism. Moreschi (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Libya

It's the de facto and much-used flag of the government of Libya as recognized by France, so its inclusion is not frivolous. AnonMoos (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]