Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Fmigneault!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waqar💬15:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:
The center's own "about us" page is not a reliable source. Please use reliable sources to establish the subject's notability, in accordance with Wikipedia's general notability guidelines.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
I can add more external references if that's really needed, but I feel they will pull their own source from the same website I already referenced, and we're getting into a catch-22 situation where, in order to get more reliable sources, I need to be able to communicate the research center on well-established references like Wikipedia.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
The sources include the "Conseil de l'innovation du Québec." (Council of Innovation of Québec) and from the Ministry of the Government of Québec's official evaluation of the research center.
Which sources would be more reliable than the official websites of government agencies? They are both reliable. The evaluation document goes very much in depth indicating the role and items the research institute works on, and they are independent organizations that provide impartial evaluation of the center.
