User talk:FlynnBytes

I'm Flynn. I'm new. I'm mostly interested in expanding stubs and editing biographies.

FlynnBytes, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi FlynnBytes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Obregón Borrero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching this, fixed it FlynnBytes (talk) 12:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nature Human Behaviour

Hello, FlynnBytes. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nature Human Behaviour, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 23:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Maasuni (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SmartSE (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FlynnBytes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Don't understand what's going on, please CheckUser FlynnBytes (talk) 21:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's obvious that you understand what happened. We do not checkuser accounts to prove innocence. Huon (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FlynnBytes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was blocked and read the guide. How am I supposed to get unblocked then? This is totally random. Should I create a new account? FlynnBytes (talk) 22:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Given your history of abuse, you are unlikely to be unblocked. You certainly won't be unblocked through this account, as it is not eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's also obvious that you understand why you were blocked. No, you should not create a new account. Huon (talk) 22:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hells no! Do not create yet another account. Please request consideration of an unblock on your original account. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]