User talk:Flygirl14

3=Kafziel is continuing to delete my acount This is my response and it Stays

Don't delete the stuff of of my account... I posted this and I meant it To address your issues:3=Kafziel- your accusation: re-creating BLP-violating bio".</nowiki>|3=Kafziel|4=984372}} . It haf not been decided as violating aty the time you blocked. Are you 3=Kafziel saying that your beliefs superceed my rights to post an artcile on a free to the public website, because you personally deem the article un worthy.? I posted the article because I believe it is -notable. You ILLEGALLY banned my IP address because you can't handle someone disagreeing with you. According to Wikipedia we both have rights, not just you and your un fair "Fascist" ideology. Your IP address is being found,( by someone more computer savvy then I) and you will be legally served because you have violated my consitutional rights too FREE SPEECH. Are you going to ban me from from a public access IP address, the word PUBLIC and FREEDOM OF SPEECH are in the AMERICAN Constitution, Perhaps you come from somewhere else, but here we on a public posting site have rights LEGALLY. THE First amendment in the Ameican Constitution. You appear slightly unaware of the fact that your rebuttal is completely personally charged and has nothing to do with Wikipedia Guidelines, so you are deciding you don't LIKE or BELIEVE in certain individuals, so you are personally discriminating against an individual. THAT IS ILLEGAL. Maybe I should ban your IP address because you are ignorant to equality and fairness in a public venue.

WARNING if you continue to block my IP address, then have some GUTS and leave your name and address so I can serve you, I will track you LEGALLY, YOU have NO legal right to do what you did. I posted NOTHING Offensive, PERIOD. I posted and article I wrote, If the links were broken tough, you still found the documented websites and YOU have NO LEGAL right to BLOCK ANY LEGALAPPROPRIATE ARTICLE - Are you discriminating against Jewish writers? Exactly what gives you the Right...? Who are you...? NO WHERE on Wikipedia does it say the Entertainer, must appear SPECIFICALLY by themselves and only themselves, to make the entertainers appearance valid-notable, by your line of thinking you would need to discard all talk show appearances such as Montel Williams and David Letterman, as they have multiple listed on Wikipedia guests of all levels. " The Fact A Psychic, in a world of thousands is asked and paid to appear on a talkshow is notable, it osn't cable TV it is a paid - Refer to AFTRA , the television union of which Montel are held legally responsible to uphold. What gives you the right and maybe you'll get banned, becaue of your being a bully- ARE YOU SURE YOU HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT and if so Then I HAVE THE SAME RUGHT TO TAKE YOU OFF. It may take me a while to become more computer proficient, but I will and you will be banned for being an ABUSIVE EDITOR. Legally I will test you again so as to add up you ignrance and legal offensces so that when your served that is documentd proof.. Try it and see. Its notable, The Show "Lets Talk Paranormal " Listed as a reference- has two 1 hour episodes aired, Its a show in the psychic field, that is valid if you check the link http://www.letstalkparanormal.com/ and go to show 37-54 and click on the video it will play, Montel Williams is Valid PERIOD regardless of how many Ghost Hunters and Authors guests were on the show. Wikipedia does not have guest amount requirements.

Sassy Bean is a website run by the Lifetime reality show "Date doctor" "Matt Tittus" who invited all the "It Girls" to participate and if you bother to read ALL of the biographs about the "It Girls" were copied from their personal websites, it would appear the site tauted them as "It Girls because of accomplishments in their personal fields and then asked them to answer questions, and perhpas the editor copied bios from the idividuals personal sites, humm like Wikipedia. Why don't you e-mail them and ask. I did. Should you need verifable proof, their editor will send your Lawyer proof. As for the "Dinning with the Dead" Website. If you will read, on the producers site http://www.margarewendt.com and http://www.dinngwiththedead.com it appears Ms. Wendt created the show and is a legall business licensed Production house, both of Documentarys and a producer of Metaphysical TV shows with an extensive background who hired Bella, making (Wendt both a fan and a person who employed Ms,. Bella to do a TV show being slated for webisodes and shows- certainly giving her liscence to write and article on Wikipedia) Bella was hired to participate on camera, along with Cross Road films, their are three different links to the 1st episode of Dining with the dead promo. As for their information changing is the website, I am assuming a webmaster updates the site- like Jerry Sinfields website of which that entertainer owns percentages of his on camera apperances and back end marketing, so his website that refers to his work is owned by him- Your lack of knowledge is evident. is that against Wikipedia? Wikipedia updates, why can't other people, secondly, perhaps wendt and Bella have a share in the website due to backend monetary gain especially if the producer created the show and the talent is contractually obligated for a percentage. If you went further in your searching you would see www.diningwiththedeadtv.com is owned by "Crossroadfilms" So the implication seems accurate. As for the Isar website your argument is specious in nature. Ms. Bella have been in the field for 20 years and a paid on camera Astrological consultant,something like a seasoned athlete, or musician,. She is certified and technically trained Astrologer. Your issue is what with that is what. The link is there in writing. so because you choose to invalidate it, you Ban my IP address. ILLEGAL Discrimination! House Busters website states what it states, I beleive it say Bellawas one of the Psychics Paid to do the Pilot- Humm what is notable about that - Paid professional and a pilot is a tool used to SELL the show to the Network. Which means the NETWORK gave the PRODUCTION COMPANY MONEY based on that performance. Can You do that.? NOTABLE

House Busters website states what it states PERIOD. Because you don't like what it states is not he point. You obviously have an ISSUE with Psychics, so please validate why these ones Silvia Browne, who by the way started on TV with Ms. Bella, James Van Praagh, and on the lesser know psychic side Jackie Barrett, Lisa Williams, Bella has been on camera and know in her field and yes it is notable.

YOU HAVE A PERSONAL ISSUE and are abusing your authority or which you have no more then I. I will again put the article up and up and up and you will need to explain yourself legally as to why someone like Jackie Barrett remain and you choose to remove this one, you will need to explain why you are preventing an individual from posting and article they believe is relevant from posting it.

Blocked again

Indef block reinstated. Just because Wikipedia is free of charge to the public does not mean you are free to print whatever you want. That has been explained to you time and time again, and you have persisted in violating our policies. That was the reason for your original block. I unblocked you long before you ever posted that unblock tag, but I can see that was a mistake. You were unblocked so you could participate in the deletion review discussion, not so you could continue with your little tantrum. So now you're blocked again, for repeated violations of our biographical policies as well as for personal attacks and legal threats. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 20:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)