User talk:FluTrackingTom

This is FluTrackingTom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://info.flutracking.net/about/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:FluTrackingTom/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 02:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FluTrackingTom! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 02:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://info.flutracking.net/about/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:FluTrackingTom/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FluTracking (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The FluTracking website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FluTracking and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:50, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "FluTrackingTom", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. echidnaLives - talk - edits 07:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EchidnaLives, the username is covered under the "Sara Smith at XYZ Company" exception in the message you left. Tom has also complied with the WP:PAID requirements on User:FluTrackingTom. The equivalent declaration on the draft's talk page is all that's missing here.

Renamer note: I declined the rename request as it was based on a flawed reading of the policy. Cabayi (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi Understood, thank you. echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi thank you for your advice, and thank you @EchidnaLives flagging this potential error. I have attempted to declare any perceived/actual COI using the COI template. FluTrackingTom (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

feedback on sources

Please see my feedback on the today's sources of the draft here,

and please query the medicine wikiproject talk page for assistance with finding more sources. Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 05:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please share your feedback

Hello FluTrackingTom

I helped you at live chat earlier and created the section here with sources about 'FluTracking' just wondering

On the scale of from 0 to 10, with 0 being useless and 10 being very helpful, how informative did you find this page?
What improvements would you suggest to make source analysis easier for you?
What is your further plan with the draft?

Please reply at your earliest convenience; feedback is important to me. Thanks. -- Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 21:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

G'day @Gryllida

Thank you for the time and effort you put into providing feedback on the listed sources of the draft page. I definitely would rate this feedback as a 10! Being new to Wikipedia from a content contributor perspective I must admit the process is not as intuitive as I perceived it would be. As stated by my user name and the COI declaration I have made, I do work as a project officer on the FluTracking program, and making our way onto Wikipedia is one of my goals. As such I plan to continue to refine this draft to hopefully meet publication standards. I will however only be working on this draft during core business hours between other tasks.

I must admit that when I saw that there was a page for Influenzanet I thought a page for FluTracking would be warranted (especially in a post COVID-19 world).

Apologies for the rambling reply, in summary to your dot points:

10/10
Nil suggestions, your source analysis descriptions were clear and succinct
Continue to work on the draft over time with the aim of publication approval.

Thanks again, Tom FluTrackingTom (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FluTracking (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FluTracking and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 10:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this page. I will definitely try to work on it in preparation for re-submission. FluTrackingTom (talk) 21:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FluTracking (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More inline citations need to be added to the body of the article. Currently, most of the body is entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FluTracking and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm DB1729. I noticed that in this edit to FluTracking, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DB1729^talk 21:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FluTracking

Your recent item has been returned to draftspace for development. Please continue to imrove it there and complete the review process before publication. Please do not move to mainspace again or it may be liable to deletion. Eagleash (talk) 22:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FluTracking

Hello, FluTrackingTom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FluTracking, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FluTracking

Hello, FluTrackingTom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FluTracking".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]