User talk:Fls098/sandbox

Sidney's peer review

-First sentence, take away the word "for" (i.e. Mangrove forests have a potential to mitigate climate change,...)

-Good, strong lead, lets readers know the importance of how mangrove forests can actually mitigate the effects of climate change

-"Mangroves contribute a small 0.7% to tropical forest areas..." 0.7% what? Just need to clarify here

-The sentence "Indonesia is the location of most of this carbon, followed by Brazil, Malaysia and Nigeria" could be re-worded to "Indonesia appears to be the location containing most of this carbon, followed by Brazil, Malaysia, and Nigeria"

-Remove the comma in the first sentence of the third paragraph "...program to combat climate change..."

-Add a link to REDD in the sentence "It is the opinion of literary scholars that the REDD program can increase carbon sequestration from mangroves and therefore reduce carbon in the atmosphere."

-Re-word sentence to "The ten least developed countries are prioritizing mangroves in their NAMAs."

-Structure is clear and organized

-Neutral tone

-All references seem to be from reliable sources

Overall very good addition to this article!

Sidneysmiith (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Sidneysmiith

Peer Review

Excellent work so far. Good lead section on the importance of mangroves, providing the reader with easy to understand information. Good structure to the article and sequence of paragraphs. An addition of subsection titles to the mangroves as climate change mitigation section might make the article appeared more organized E.g. a subsection for the REED section and one for the MFF section. Good use of neutral tone throughout the article and good choice of reliable sources for the citation of necessary information. Overall, lots of in depth information that forms a nicely written article. Varelasara (talk) 00:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)