User talk:FlowerofScotland

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello FlowerofScotland! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Citing sources Neutral Point of View Describing points of view Attribution Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Etiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Resolving disputes
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Tools Village pump

January 2009

Welcome, and thank you for your edits to Rags (dog). Unfortunately I have had to revert them to respect WP:Copyright as you had incorporated text from this source. Please take the time to read [[WP:5P]. You'll find it very helpful.LeadSongDog (talk) 03:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

“

Editing Rags is my first encounter with Wikipedia and I am not even sure this communication is being correctly handled.

The written edits that you removed are my material copied from my original article written over 10 years ago.

At their request I sent copies of my original work to both the Harbor Defense Museum at Fort Hamilton in New York City and the 1st Division Museum outside Chicago. they both have these copies in their files. The 1st Division Museum sent me a release form allowing them to reproduce my work which I signed and returned.

I then made the mistake of placing the exact same story of Rags on a Web Page created on AOL. Since that time my work or parts of it copied word for word have appeared on a number of other Web Sites, including the one you refer to in your message. The Find A Grave web page uses my information and a web page K9History used my material word for word with the comment that " it was found in cyber space".

My belief is that the material I placed on the Rags page is coprighted to me as the original author and the source you name and others have violated my copyright. Only the 1st Division Museum in Chicago is permitted to use it.

My AOL web page no longer exists since AOL has ended that program.

My history with Rags goes back over 60 years. I first read Jack Rohan's book as a boy and upon retiring in the early 1990's researched Rags at the N.Y. Public Library and used Rohan's Book and N.Y. Times articles to write my paper on Rags. I have since been able to obtain a first edition copy of Rags.

I might add that I have 3 degrees in History, the most recent being an Honors level from the University of Dundee in Scotland.

In restoring the information to the Rags page you have restored a number of errors. Rags was born in France not the U.S. and the events of July were the 14th, Bastille Day, not the 15th and the year was 1918 not 1917. Also the term press-ganged is totally inapprobriate.

I might also note that I have listed the sources for my material which you will not find with any of the other copies of my work.

In summary: The copyright for any of the original, sourced work I placed on the Rags page is mine. FlowerofScotland (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

”

Thank you for the reply. For topics pertinent to the article, the article's talk page is the best discussion venue, but because you are new here on WP I raised it here on your talk page as is the normal courtesy. I've copied it back to this page (above) from my talk for the sake of continuity of discussion.
On WP we are very big on citing sources to prevent this kind of problem from arising. My sympathies on the abuse of your work, but you should be aware of the fact that anything you post on WP without express attribution will be assumed to be your original contribution which "You irrevocable agree to release ... under the terms of the GFDL". If you are content to do so, simply provide a citation for where you published the original work and I'll be more than happy to undo my revert and add that citation to the article.
In general, WP avoids self published sources (such as your AOL page) but as you say this was simply a reissue of something you previously had published that principle may not apply in this case. Cheers,LeadSongDog (talk) 17:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to verify your publication, but as yet have been unsuccessful. It does not appear in major catalogues that I've checked, and (as you have said) AOL's hometown sites have been shut down. Perhaps correspondence with the First Infantry Division museum's librarian will be more fruitful. Hang in there.LeadSongDog (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:RagsFortHam.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RagsFortHam.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Misapplication of capitals

Once again, I've corrected the capitals you added in the section titles. This is as per Wikipedia's Manual of Style, see WP:MOS#HEAD. Please stop re-adding them, they are wrong. We only capitalize proper nouns and the first word of the title. Also, please be careful to log in when editing. Cheers, LeadSongDog come howl 19:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rags2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rags2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and follow the above instructions. You'll need to add the license tag to the image file, not to the article using it. Thanks, LeadSongDog come howl 21:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! –Mabeenot (talk) 18:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rags.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rags.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish Soldier In World War 1, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scottish Army In World War 1 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scottish Army In World War 1, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scottish Army In World War 1

Hello, FlowerofScotland. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Scottish Army In World War 1".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scottish Army In World War I (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of British divisions in World War I instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scottish Army In World War I and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Scottish Army In World War I concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Scottish Army In World War I, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]