User talk:FloridaFox

Welcome!

Hello, FloridaFox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 20:06, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Appologies

I was unaware of the fact that Winters is deceased. I shall not revert your edit assuming that you will provide a reference tomorrow from a local newspaper or other reliable source. Rafiqr 04:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historical not history

I'm sorry, I read the word out of context. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BaRiMzI (talk • contribs) 02:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

May 2007

For the record, none of my entries were vandalism but quite accurate additions. The editor, moving about rather swiftly in order to stop genuine vandalism, simply adjudged my accurate entries as vandalism in order to move on. Wikipedia encourages people to add to incomplete lists. I am very sorry that TREYwiki misidentified my entries as vandalism but I shall no longer participate in this web site for fear further contributions will likewise be deemed vadalism and I shall be banned from the site.

FloridaFox

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from CBS News, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --TREYWiki 23:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Zappone

Where are the references and sources in this article on Tony Zappone? There aren't any. --K72ndst 21:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But none of the references are in the article, how come? This isn't Wiki policy. I appreciate all the links you put onto my user page (should be on the Discussion page, like all others....) but the article really does not conform to Wiki policy for a living person. Listing phone numbers of sources? Why? --K72ndst 21:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just as soon as I have sufficient time I will work them in as well as I can without muddying up the article. The bio you put up about yourself, Kevin C. Fitzpatrick, has unsourced and undocumented information but remains an excellent read. I enjoyed it without it being mired in references.

I provided names and phone numbers of sources in my message to you for the convenience of anyone who wished to challenge the legitimacy of what was written. These sources are not secret and are accessible.

I hope you go after those bios and articles which are a lot worse and those who write falsehoods on this site with as much passion and zeal as you have shown here. Meanwhile, if you care to simply delete the article I have no objections to that. This site can be exhausting for legitimate writers and a piece of cake for frauds, meaning no disrespect to you. Just a candid observation. FloridaFox 00:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Breath at a Time, Inc.

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to One Breath at a Time, Inc.. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 17:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of One Breath at a Time, Inc.

A tag has been placed on One Breath at a Time, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. superβεεcat 01:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, you have to understand that every article up here has to meet notability standards, that is, carefully read WP:N. That includes red cross, microsoft, and everyone else. That article had not a single citation of a reliable secondary source. Moreover, licenses that purport to give a free license to wikipedia, are not fair game to make wikipedia articles from, wikipedia articles are created using sourced material, not first hand research or reposts of public-domain articles. - superβεεcat 01:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of One Breath at a Time, Inc.

An editor has nominated One Breath at a Time, Inc., an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Breath at a Time, Inc. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Paul Antinori.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Antinori.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Amend Constitution.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Amend Constitution.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Movement to Amend the U.S. Constitution

A tag has been placed on Movement to Amend the U.S. Constitution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 16:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Paul Antinori2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Antinori2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jayron32 16:58, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Antinori (Attorney, Author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Antinori (Attorney, Author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Antinori (Attorney, Author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jayron32 17:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Amend Constitution2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amend Constitution2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Antinori2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paul Antinori2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tony Zappone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

president-a-kid-and-his-camera|date=2013-12-01|Cigar City Magazine, Tampa, Fl., Winter Issue, 2013)</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]