User talk:Floriando

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christoph Scherrer has been accepted

Christoph Scherrer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About International Center for Development and Decent Work (ICDD))

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give International Center for Development and Decent Work (ICDD)) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into International Center for Development and Decent Work (ICDD). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. EDM fan 2 (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello Floriando. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Floriando. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Floriando|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answer Dear 331dot, thanks for your concern. I am not a paid user and receive no compensation for this contribution. I am a former student of a master program at the center (GPED), and am doing this as a voluntary unpaid contribution. This is a research center working at a public university in the public interest, it is not a company promoting a product. I can look for further references as requested.

Thanks for your reply. If you are not paid, okay. Please understand that you don't have to be selling a product to be promoting something, as Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage, and not mere reporting of the organization's activities or what it considers to be its mission- showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I do think the ICDD meets the criteria for a a notable organization.

See:

The director is of course mentioned in many more newspapers, which are way too many to list. Could you please support the moving ahead of the ICDD article? Floriando (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have submitted it for a review, I think some other eyes on it besides me would be helpful before it is placed in the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:International Center for Development and Decent Work

Hello, Floriando. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Center for Development and Decent Work, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Center for Development and Decent Work

Hello, Floriando. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "International Center for Development and Decent Work".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 19:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Eternal Shadow, I have addressed the unfounded concerns of 331dot (see above) and am very sad the article was simply deleted. I will do no further efforts to contribute to wikipedia if a single user can falsely accuse me and take the article offline. Floriando (talk) 08:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]