Jump to content

User talk:Flipwared

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Flipwared, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 00:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section Size

The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

< 15,000 characters medium size > 30,000 characters
one or two paragraphs   two or three paragraphs   three or four paragraphs
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

An article you recently created, List of major wildfires in 2008, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 06:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alberto Crescenti for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alberto Crescenti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto Crescenti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 09:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Cardozo

[edit]

Is this article a machine translation of an es.wiki article? WCMemail 00:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: Hi, there's no article on esWiki. I wrote it myself. Flipwared (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, whilst you may have sourced this to some Argentine sources, much of what you have written simply isn't true. Brook Hardcastle wasn't a farm manager at the time, he had become a manager for FIC. The land for the Argentine cemetery was donated by the FIC for the purposes of interring the Argentine dead. It was actually the chairman of the FIC (a catholic) who donated it, simply because he couldn't bear the thought of those poor souls rotting in battlefield graces whilst the Argentine government postured. The Argentine cemetery isn't anywhere near the Darwin cemetery, where only islanders are buried. The Argentine cemetery is at a place called Fish Creek. The Kirchner's did nothing toward identifying the Argentine dead, they made a lot of fuss in the press but never actually spoke to the British government. The DNA identification only occurred because of Macri's government who engaged with HMG. Roger Waters was credited but in fact had nothing to do with it. I'm sorry, I'm sure this was a genuine attempt but there is so much BS circulated in the Argentine press that your article is fatally flawed. WCMemail 00:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wee Curry Monster: Well, I've read all the sources cited and wrote the article according to that. The Brook Hardcastle mention was taken from here and it seems to have been said by Cardozo himself (it's a written interview, so its hard to actually prove he said that name). It might however be speculation of journalist Gabriela Cociffi. Then I read on the NYT reference that the land was donated by a farmer. I apologize for the Darwin Cemetery confusion. About the Kirchner involvement, I didn't intent to say that she accomplished anything, it was just a mention to give some context on why Roger Waters was given an award also given to Cardozo. I didn't write anything more about the identification process itself as this article is about Cardozo and the Cemetery already has its own article. Feel free to improve it with every knowledge you might have, I will appreciate it! Thanks. Flipwared (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy to correct your article, I felt I should reach out first so you don't take it the wrong way when I do. I don't mean to offend but my experience of Argentine editors has not always been positive, usually when I offer help and advise it is rejected out of hand simply because I was born in the UK. Regards, WCMemail 00:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wee Curry Monster: Please, none taken. I actually tried to use as many international sources to avoid any Argentine or UK bias on the conflict. Still, it's not always easy. Thanks again, feel free to reach out whenever you want. Flipwared (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flipwared. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of major wildfires in 2008".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]