User talk:FlightTime/Archive 36

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current page.

← Archive 35

Archive 36

Archive 37 →

California Dreamin

Archived discussions

The following page is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Not sure where this is heading, I am sure I don't want to go there, This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

hi FlightTime, Anton Lavey grew up in California..do you think he was an evil person?.daughters Zeena and Karla seem like normal people.. Gfigs (talk) 11:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gfigs: I'm sorry, what the hell are you talking about?

- FlightTime (open channel) 17:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

he said he worked for 3yrs as a photographer and psychic investigator for the San Francisco Police Department..I find it difficult to believe he had occult powers, could kill someone..would he not have been arrested for doing this? Gfigs (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

does this make sense..is the Church of Satan legal?.

the only time a LaVeyan Satanist would perform a human sacrifice would be to accomplish two goals: to "release the magician's wrath" as he or she performed a curse, and to kill someone who deserved to die. --from article The Satanic Bible

Gfigs (talk) 19:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I think it is a symbolic "human sacrifice"?.. better explained in Greater and lesser magic..

Neither animal nor human sacrifice takes place..Destruction rituals are designed to do harm to others and involve the symbolic annihilation of an enemy through the use of "vicarious" human sacrifice often involving a customized effigy representing the intended victim which is then put through ritual fire, smashing, or other representation of obliteration.

Gfigs (talk) 19:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can only imagine he must have felt it was a terrible mistake..if he had intended to kill Jayne Mansfields lover and attorney Sam Brody, with a curse, and ended up also killing Jayne Mansfield, whom he had declared a Satanic High priestess, and was having a relationship with, in a car crash, and an innocent driver?.. Gfigs (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

California Dreamin 2

hi FlightTime, I was heading to 1969, start of Golden Age of Porn, and also year that Anton Lavey published the Satanic Bible (Dec 1969)..I do not mind, you don't wish to discuss this..doubt will be able to do so on Wikipedia, or social networks..maybe will keep trying to do so on internet..best regards Gfigs (talk) 07:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

Hi. I have a question about Stephen Kovacs, which I see you helped edit. A new article. It doesn't seem to come up on a google search for some reason. Does that just take time? Or is there something that needs fixing? Thanks. You seem experienced. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 23:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mail Notice

{{ygm}} Celestina007 (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Replied. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I too am not as active on Wikipedia as I used to be. I appreciate your alacrity in reverting this vandalism. So tedious, isn't it? Carbon Caryatid (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Carbon Caryatid: You're very welcome. Thank you also, it was a delightful surprise, seeing your message first thing this morning, I needed a little lift and you did the trick. As far as activity, I just got burnt out for awhile and lately I've been on most of the time, I'm hooked

Have a great day. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Message from CoolChib124

Look, I went to SJK (C) Shih Chung Cawangan. So stop changing the entire system, your making fun of the name, I hope the ghosts from Shih Chung Branch School finds you. CoolChib124 (talk) 14:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CoolChib124: Personal knowledge is not verifiable to our readers or editors and therefore not acceptable. Sorry, - FlightTime (open channel) 16:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

at least i know more about the school than you CoolChib124 (talk) 01:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CoolChib124: I relinquish to your knowledge. If you need help in the future (with Wikipedia) please don't hesitate to stop by. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 01:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC) - FlightTime (open channel) 01:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A (very) late apology

Hey FlightTime, I highly doubt you remember this, but I want to very belatedly apologize for my dumbassery back in 2017 over this. I was just being an overzealous fan and wasn't thinking. I dunno why, but this has been on my mind lately. Thank you! ♠JCW555 talk♠ 04:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JCW555: Wow, a blast from.... well you know

Please ease your mind of that, absolutely no problem. You're welcome here any time. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 04:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Not interested in the subject matter. This discussion/section is closed
- FlightTime (open channel) 16:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Hi, there is currently a requested move at Talk:Odessa that you may be interested in since you were previously involved in discussions about renaming the article. OjdvQ9fNJWl (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from Eassa

Hello, you reverted my edit to Salome Jens. I added her date of birth and referenced IMDB. I would have thought they are reliable in such things.^[1]. The same birthdate is given in Memory Alpha^[2]

So what is a reliable source for an actor's age? Eassa (talk) 23:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

@Eassa: that's why I left this link WP:IMDB, it explaines the rational for removal. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Road House (1989) Original Cut

So, what's the second problem :) Andrew Ryder — Preceding undated comment added 17:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Ryder: The information doesn't seem notable and your source doesn't seem reliable, so lets see what other editors have to say. You've been editing for over seven years, please take the time and review Wikipedia:Signatures. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply and for the advice! Here's the thing about Road House, if you're even interested. '89 article with Sam Elliot interview is available online, but for some reason text won't load for me. And for obvious reasons, i can't just find that making of or commentary online where the info i heard is mentioned. I'll ask for help in Road House talk page, in case of any other issues or anything else regarding this, please reply over there if necessary. Andrew Ryder (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Andrew Ryder for your very sincere reply, I do like the film Road House and the song, also a very devoted fan of Patrick Swayze and Sam Elliott, however I'm more of a maintenance editor and a lousy content or research editor. Thank you very much for your contributions. If there is anything you think I can help you with, you're always welcome here. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mail Notice

{{ygm}} Celestina007 (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Replied. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By The Way

Thats a cute dog you have there, thanks for preventing any Vandalism on Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.224.151 (talk) 01:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ACC Barnstar

		The Account Creation Barnstar
		For your tireless work at ACC and for taking time to teach me the ropes. About a year and some months ago when I petitioned to join, I thought I was merely extending my service to the community, not knowing I had entered a family. Thank you for all what you do Celestina007 (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007: Thank you. (There're more deserving users, but thanx) - FlightTime (open channel) 15:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Jkhoughton

You removed my edit of Snoop Doggs bio and sports clubs that he supports, WHY? He is in fact a supporter of Celtic Football Club which are based in Scotland. Please search Snoop Dogg Celtic Fan on Google and you will see the facts. Many thanks, Jai Jkhoughton (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jkhoughton: (The reason for the removal is stated in my edit summary), you did not provide a reliable source to support your claim. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I myself am the reliable source, I would NOT add an edit if it were NOT true. Lies in today's media are what is wrong with todays media, I myself am in fact a fan of Celtic Football Club, as are Robert Downey Jr, Gérard Butler, Connor MacGregor, Charisma Carpenter who have all openly admitted they are fans. Jkhoughton (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal knowledge is not verifiable to our readers or editors and therefore not acceptable, please review Wikipedia:Verifiability - FlightTime (open channel) 00:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Process wonkery

Okay, I get it. This template was not the exact correct perfect one to use. Thanks. Far better to let unregistered editors swoop in and mark the subject of a BLP as dead despite no reliable sources saying so. I'm glad you're now watchlisting and keeping an eye on this BLP, because I'm not. — THIS IS TREY MATURIN 19:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trey Maturin I'm not watching Denise Coffey, I'm always watching Category:Recent deaths. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So it was a drive-by untagging, leaving a BLP to be ravaged by any IP editor who wanted to declare the subject dead without providing any proof... and you had no intention of doing any policing of those edits whatsoever, you were only interested in making sure a slightly wrong tag was not used? Well, that's just great. Well done. Let me know when you're up for an RFA. — THIS IS TREY MATURIN 18:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shia Labeouf

Why are you going against consensus on the Labeouf talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.9.194 (talk) 00:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What consensus? - FlightTime (open channel) 01:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, everyone on the talk page agrees with me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.9.194 (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi FlightTime! I just wanted to let you know that I reverted this edit of yours on Holland Taylor only because it still included her (not real/cited) date of death, incorrect infobox dates, etc. There was some kind of media rumor about her death that was false and there was no citation. I understand why you restored your prior version with the edit warring going on, you may have just missed the other parts that were incorrect also. Just wanted to let you know! Thanks and cheers! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 22:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I already knew she was not dead, just reverted to an incorrect version. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add to watchlist

Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing Wildlife overpass slated for '24 - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 17:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 2604:3D08:A37C:5600:CDB1:9C2A:5F66:BC58

Hi there FlightTime.

I am a representative on behalf of Paul Rodgers and his personal estate and would like to ask that changes made as requested by him and his family are respected as they would like to keep their personal and private life off of Wikipedia. We are extremely uncomfortable with the exact whereabouts of their residence being public knowledge. Additionally, any edits I submit have been reviewed and requested by Paul's wife, Cynthia. I ask that you revert back to the changes we submitted in early April. Thanks, Shaughnessy 2604:3D08:A37C:5600:CDB1:9C2A:5F66:BC58 (talk) 18:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @2604:3D08:A37C:5600:CDB1:9C2A:5F66:BC58:, before I will respond to your query, please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, if after reviewing these guidelines you still have questions, please do not hesitate to stop back by here. (Also, there are no need to ping a user on their talk page, that happens automatically). Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd has an RFC

Pink Floyd has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TSP (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Amadeus1999

Hey there, first off, adorable dogs!

Secondly, I saw you reverted my self-revert based on Wikipedia not being a good source, however, on the Talk page of the user who placed them, he mentioned he wrote is years ago with sources, see the discussion here. Not sure why we'd still want it reverted then haha. Feel free to tell me though, I'm still an absolute noob compared to you. ★Ama ^TALK ^CONTRIBS 22:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP query

Hi: I left you a reply to your warning on my talk page but you never saw it. Can you please let me know what exactly I did wrong when I made that edit before I start editing again? It was an honest mistake. 67.173.50.123 (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, names do not go where you put one. See Special:Diff/1088413758 - FlightTime (open channel) 00:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not originally make that edit. I am an anti-vandalism trainee and another IP editor made that edit and I originally thought that it was vandalism so I reverted it, but after examining the edit I noticed that it was not vandalism so I reinstated it but I did not know that it does not belong there. Sorry. 67.173.50.123 (talk) 21:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, most everything is fixable. Cheers - FlightTime (open channel) 21:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Flaminfarthippo

Flaminfarthippo (talk) 01:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Hey, I did not intend or mean to attack the editor (I don't think I said anything offensive). My apologies if that came off that way. I am frustrated though on why the admin has to attack one school's Wikipedia page when others get off Scott free.[reply]

Nobody is anal, we're all volunteers here. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was a poor choice of words haha, didn't mean it literally but more of the "anal-retentive" or fussy but yeah I agree. Thank you for being logical. Ik you are not involved with this dispute, but I don't see how my page is any different from other more notable schools. Not trying to harm anyone but merely trying to help a local school :) Flaminfarthippo (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, discussing the issues like you're doing is the way to go around here. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 02:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 103.114.211.46

103.114.211.46 (talk) 15:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello FlightTime. nice to meet you. I love your dogs. @FlightTime:. signed,103.114.211.46 (talk) 15:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Thank you, so do I :) - FlightTime (open channel) 15:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime:in your "significant other"s homepage it says she is owned by one or more dogs. is that true? if it is, are humans starting to get domesticated? or is it a joke? or is it just a typing error? signed, 103.114.211.8 (talk) 05:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Santana

Carlos Santana was born in Mexico therefore that makes him a Mexican. He’s a Mexican guitarist. If anything maybe Mexican American because he probably has American Citizenship also. Vlcaraballo (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vlcaraballo: Please discuss your concerns on the article talk page, not here. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where’s the article talk page? Vlcaraballo (talk) 13:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vlcaraballo: Here: Talk:Carlos Santana - FlightTime (open channel) 13:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh got it. Sorry about that. I was just say that Carlos Santana was born in Mexico and has American Citizenship which makes him a Mexican American. Vlcaraballo (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vlcaraballo: Review the discussions already there about this very issue. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 13:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Nicholson

This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Hello,

Thanks for telling me to use a source. I'm currently editing my sentence back with the source provided in dril's article. I fucked up the citation coding so I'm just fixing it atm. I just wanted to say - you were otherwise nice to me and extremely polite - but from now on in similar instances, please don't use caps lock like you did when you said "NOT" a reliable source. You saw I was trying to be constructive by how you wrote "good faith edits" and it seemed like you were shouting at me when you wrote "NOT". That wasn't helpful, especially since this hadn't been going on for long. 92.10.13.209 (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your understanding, however, that was not cap-lock, it was an "on purpose shift". Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean 92.10.13.209 (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Titanic talk

Let's tapk on Titanic talk page first Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anshul Srivastava.21: That's exactly what you should of done in the first place. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Titanic 2

We. Need to discuss this edit Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want right now no problem man Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I think we should discuss the issue Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As u have approached the talk on my page to send a msg to your talk page , we should discuss the issue of u want Anshul Srivastava.21 (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You start a discussion, who comments there is to be seen. Personally, I couldn't care less if the sourced information you removed stays or is removed, however, what I do care about is, newbies removing sourced content without consensus. Good luck with your concerns at this discussion. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from SimpsonDG

Waiting for punishment. This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

I would like to know why, when you saw I made an edit that needed a source, you felt it necessary to threaten me with a block. And why did you falsely accuse me of "continued disruptive editing"? You know that's not true. If you needed a source for my edit, you could have just asked me to provide one, and I would have provided it. Instead, you chose a threat as your first means of communications. Please explain. SimpsonDG (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SimpsonDG (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SimpsonDG: That's all I did, asked to provide a source for the edit you made, you've been here nearly 16 years, shouldn't you know the S.O.P. around here. The template I left is an approved warning template used by Twinkle, You are free to have the template's wording changed at Template talk:uw-nor3 Happy retirement. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 21:56, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you THREATENED me. You threatened to have me blocked. You could have -- and should have -- simply asked me to provide a source for the edit. That would be the civil thing to do. Instead, you threatened to have me blocked, and falsely accused me of "continued disruptive editing". It's like greeting a man you're meeting for the first time by punching him in the face. I don't understand why you would do something like that. You've been at Wikipedia long enough to know that communications are supposed to be "civil" (WP:CIV). After your initial threat, other editors came along to join in the fun, each making his own series of threats. None of this is very "civil," and does not encourage people to participate in Wikipedia. Next time you need to communicate with an editor, how about showing some manners and start with something like: "Hello!" and "Would you please provide a source for your recent edit?" What you did comes across like "Do what I say, or I'll bash your face in."

I'm not going to try to have the template changed. You know as well as I do that any attempt to change the template would be reverted within minutes. And it would be followed by threats. SimpsonDG (talk) 23:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Hello

Hey, FlightTime. I just started here. Do you have any pointers or anything? You’ve been on Wikipedia for a while. It seems harder than it looks. MySacrifices (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MySacrifices: Just review the links in the welcome template I left, kinda depends on what you want to do here. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cool, thanks for replying! I’ll read the welcome tab. Cheers, - MySacrifices (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MySacrifices: There're guidelines on talk page discussions here: Help:Talk pages including Indentation and Notifying other users. If you have any specific questions you can always ask here. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Maher

Added sourced information regarding the Maher podcast, Club Random. Still not sure why you would revert something that is commonly known and there is sourcing within the article...But added extra sourcing as well.The One I Left (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The One I Left: (really?) Because it's a BLP. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Further, if there were sources that support, that should be mentioned in an edit summary. You really think all editors read the whole article before a unsourced revert, that's what ES's are for. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Help:Edit summary - FlightTime (open channel) 19:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! I would recommend looking more closely than quickly reverting as you did. You reverted within seconds. lol The One I Left (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's already sourced within the article. I don't see any sourcing for Real Time with Bill Maher in the lead.The One I Left (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankses

[1] The thanks link thanks are public, in case you were unaware. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware. I was talking about noticeboards and/or talk pages. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 01:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, gotcha. I didn't mean to imply you were doing anything in bad taste either. That editor was clearly trolling for reactions, or out to right great wrongs. Even their edits to the lead of cunt had that air to them. As always, a pleasure to interact with you. I'm sure I'll see you on my edit request patrols. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, thanx (publicly) :P - FlightTime (open channel) 01:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Fountains of Bryn Mawr

Hi, just leaving an fyi since you dealt with this user before. I can take it ti ANI if needed. User:Nerdy Felix 16 is back going on editing sprees removing/converting nationality entries to "Indian" history, edits[2][3][4][5]. Explanations that there are MOS, talk page discussions, and that sticking the word "Indian" everywhere is not very constructive, is falling on deaf ears [6][7] Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fountains of Bryn Mawr: Thanx for the note, I'm not an Admin, so ANI is probably the best avenue. You're more than welcome to link this section if you don't need to re-do all the diff's. I'll keep tabs on the report if/when you post it. again thanx. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missed the point ToBeFree was the blocking admin. Will take it to ANI, thanks. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odin (Marvel Comics character).png ‎No edit summary

Can you also rename this (File:Odin (Marvel Comics character).png) ‎file? NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoBatfreak: Sure. What title do you want and what do you mean "No edit summary"?

FlightTime, I already moved it. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 19:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okie, dokie - FlightTime (open channel) 19:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Andrew Tate copyvio

Are you saying that Talk:Andrew Tate copied from itself? —C.Fred (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: What? It's a revdel request for that version, that kind of claim should have a source, if not it shouldn't stay. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Sorry, my bad. Used wrong script, but the revdel request stands. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yeah, I see what you're getting at now. Revdeled. —C.Fred (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:12, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong

I don’t mean to sound rude here but have you LOOKED at the discography and the sources already on the page? What year were you born? “Pyromania” came out in January 20, 1983. It’s cited RIGHT THERE at the bottom of the main page. The single “Photograph” (the first single from that album was released two weeks later on 2/3/83. You are either trolling this page for some inexplicable reason or are clearly confusing the release of 1983’s “Pyromania” with 1987’s “Hysteria”. You want sources? Try Billboard.com? Or better yet deflepprd.com/album/pyromania. It’s common knowledge. It’s right there!

I’m changing it back so it’s CORRECT. Ugh! 2601:85:201:2D30:0:0:0:F1CE (talk) 03:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy lee

So idk if u saw but he posted a full on d!ck pic on everything and that’s what everyone meant by genius Ytzesza (talk) 11:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytzesza: What? He who? What? - FlightTime (open channel) 11:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angus and Malcolm and George young edits

Good evening, thankyou for highlighting the correct protocol when editing Wikipedia profiles. These are the first ever profiles I have ever edited. So I believed that editing correct information was something I could do. In terms of both George young, Malcolm young and Angus young, all I did was highlight that they were Scottish born. As they all are. The three brothers were all born in Glasgow and emigrated to Australia at the ages of 17, 10 and 8 respectively, these are well known factual events and numerous supporting sources can be found on the internet, books, documentary’s and on the brothers own Wikipedia pages. I was wondering how I should go about editing these and where I should put the supporting information. Any advice would be most grateful. As these guys are heroes of mine and I wanted to celebrate the fact they were Scottish born but also respect that they are Australian citizens and based there. Regards Woodwardo78 (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodwardo78: This has been discussed many times before (see archived discussions). The only way to post your change and have it remain is to open a new discussion and seek consensus. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Morse code **** - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Vedder

Wondering why you objected to my post Appreciate your sacrifices but you cannot deny the power of Dylan’s poetry and Vedders rendition of the song, read A Bright Shining Lie, powerful and gutting read but truth Canadiandavemaynard (talk) 22:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Canadiandavemaynard: Wikipedia is not a social site - FlightTime (open channel) 22:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

I'm requesting for make my userbox and userpage. Jxfl (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jxfl: I can try and make you a userbox on a specific subject, but I do not make userpages. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Ok, as you say :-) Jxfl (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Stephanie921

This IP: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1015:B016:EBA3:618F:64CF:E819:127 made a person attack towards me and misgendered Caitlin Jenner, reverting my edits on Linda Thompson's page. Please can u warn them since I have a low battery? Stephanie921 (talk) 04:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it has been reverted. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

`{{bots}}`

{{bots}} should be working as of now. However, I don't think it's right to use. Because the images on commons have the same name but are different images. They look similar. Thus the tag added by the bot is correct. -- GreenC 05:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Upton o god

im sorry im new to wikipedia and thank you I will reply only on the subject.

Upton o god (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Upton o god: No need to apologize. Welcome to Wikipedia. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 21:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Box office mojo updated the correct collection

Sorry sir bit ot updated the correct collection as 1.440 billion ...so u shouldn't have reverted it from next time I'll put the reference too...😊😊😊 Harharshit (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Harharshit: Please remember if you update a value, you need to update the accompanying reference, mostly to update the access date, this lets other editors know that the source was checked and still supports the information it's connected to. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 17:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patient Number 9

I couldn’t read exactly what u said so say it here Ytzesza (talk) 03:05, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ytzesza: It's a warning for editwarring, See {{uw-ew}} - FlightTime (open channel) 03:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ight thx Ytzesza (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving of File:King Charles III autograph.svg

Hi FlightTime I noticed you recently moved the aforementioned file from File:Prince Charles autograph.svg after an RM was made. I would like to note however that the new King's signature has changed to include an R for "Rex" (Latin for King) at the end (as seen on the proclamation), so the new file name is incorrect. I have suggested to file be renamed to King Charles III autograph prior to accession.svg on that page. --Ted Edwards 19:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TedEdwards:

Done File:King Charles III autograph prior to accession.svg - FlightTime (open channel) 19:35, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Kohra (estate) Draft

Link is given 👇 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kohra_(estate) DrhSR (talk) 23:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DrhSR: Sorry, I don't do article reviews. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who can article review? DrhSR (talk) 23:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DrhSR: See Wikipedia:Peer review/Guidelines - FlightTime (open channel) 23:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I do AfC draft reviews, and at this time I would decline that draft for a lack of sources demonstrating notability, and an NPOV tone. Prose like The history of this taluqdari is very glorious. and had an incomparable contribution are not encyclopedic in tone. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok DrhSR (talk) 23:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed your response at Talk:Freddie Mercury

After reviewing their edits, looked like run off the mill vandalism, so I removed the whole request. Feel free to revert of you disagree. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I thought so too, but I could've been wrong. thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 01:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure until I reviewed the contribs, so no worries. I just like to let someone know if I touch their comments in any way. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Father’s name

Dear Team to let you know i am the Subject here but my father’s name is wrong. It’s SOMESH CHAKRABORTY and not ARUN CHAKRABORTY.

And i will be great if you can update my main picture to a recent one which is more relatable than a 13 yrs old picture 🙏 120.56.119.236 (talk) 05:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What? Who? I have no idea what you're talking about. Sorry, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can add {{Request edit}} to the article talk page and explain what you need there. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 208.47.253.2

[[8]] I'm a retired USN Master Chief Petty Officer and worked within a USN Rating Lead/Manpower role. All of my edits to the Command Master Chief Petty Officer (the page title should also be capitalized, btw) are correct and applicable to current USN descriptions. One example: the CMDCM is not the highest ranking enlisted member - he is of the same paygrade/rank as every other USN Master Chief but, by assignment, holds positional authority over his unit's MCPOs and no others. Other edits are grammatical corrections for capitalization of Proper Nouns and military titles. 208.47.253.2 (talk) 17:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is me logged in now. ErikFCCM (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @ErikFCCM: Please take the discussion to Talk:Command master chief petty officer. Please also note that Wikipedia has a manual of style, and includes a specific section about military terms. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Personal knowledge is not verifiable to our readers or editors and therefore not acceptable, even if you're an Expert. If it was to be capitalized it would be. If you think it incorrect, please start a discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus, don't just show up 7 minutes ago and start changing things, we have rules and guidelines that we follow. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm not that heavily invested but your page is wrong in multiple areas. This article, as well as many others, even states that the CMDCM/FLTCM/FORCM are still E-9 paygrades which means that they are of the same rank of every other MCPO (E9) and only hold positional authority at their unit/command. And military rank and titles are proper nouns and therefore capitalized.

Leave it incorrect or accept my changes, whatever you wish. I've only served 30 years in this community and wished to put the correct information out. I do not have the time to reference these simple to understand corrections about rank (they're all E9s all the way up to the MCPON) and the capitalization. ErikFCCM (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still, the best thing you can do is open a discussion and voice your concerns. I'm talking about Capitalization, not pay grades. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jehovah's Witnesses

This discussion/section is closed.
I'm an Atheist. I believe in science and science dictates there is no such thing as a supreme being. Please do not post such things in my userspace.

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Just so you know where I was coming from, I can understand you're removing it for WP:NOTFORUM, I just disagree with your assessment of that particular removal. I haven't looked at the editors other posts but given that he was blocked for other such comments it makes sense. This particular comment, while not adding much, did attempt to add something to the conversation with

"not completely true they do belive jesus was son of god but jesus was not a prophet and jehovahs wittneses are cristians because they follow jesus example and they are loyal to jehovah they do not worship any other gods".

It's not 100% accurate (Jesus was of course a prophet according to the JW's) but it had it's points ("son of god" is correct, as is them being "cristians" and not worshipping other gods). Given that the conversation was focusing on whether they could be defined as Christians for being non-Trinitarian, it seemed appropriate. For me removing a talk post comment has to be a slam dunk case for either inappropriate or spamming, and this, again for me, didn't match it. But, like I said, the editor has been removed so no harm no foul. Hope all is well with you and yours. Vyselink (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The page above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttps://www.imdb.com/name/nm0421300/

[2] ttps://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Salome_Jens

[1]

[2]