User talk:Flexovich

Nomination of Golem (software) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golem (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golem (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slight apologies for the harsh welcome, but it was certain somebody would nominate this page for deletion; we might as well get it done with as soon as possible. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

You are required to back any cryptocurrency related content you add with reliable sources. Cryptocurrency enthusiast blogs and user-generated content are not reliable sources. MER-C 14:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing double spaces, not needed

Hi there, Flexovich, I notice that you are frequently removing double spaces as you did here today, and a few times upto 7 September 2018. There really is no need to do that—see Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Spacing: "Software condenses two or more spaces to just one when rendering a page, so editors may use any spacing style they prefer." Things that some authors prefer, normally shouldn't be turned around without a compelling reason to do so. Same thing goes for changing English language variants and such—see WP:RETAIN. So, please don't enlarge the Wikipedia datebase with edits that aren't really needed . Thanks, cheers, and happy editing! - DVdm (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know about the way wikipedia renders spacing before. Surely, I won't practice making this type of edits in the future. Thanks for leaving a comment here! Good luck. Flexovich (talk) 22:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! There's SOOO much to learn here. Enjoy! - DVdm (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Flexovich. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]