User talk:Flavius1

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Flavius1! Thank you for your contributions. I am DarjeelingTea and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DarjeelingTea (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Flavius1 (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Simon Olelkovich) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Simon Olelkovich, Flavius1!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please move your sources inline so we can see where your facts came from? Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Violation

Please understand Wikipedia has something hung called WP:3RR, which means you are only allowed 3 reverts a day. Quit reverting otherwise you can get your account blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:A:19:0:0:0:95 (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you see (and i see) vandalism in an article, the simplest thing to do is just to remove or undo it. Even more than it allows WP:3RR--Flavius1 (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Flavius1 reported by User:Nicnote (Result: ). Thank you. Nicnote^{say hello!}_contribs 15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Your recent editing history at 2017 cyberattacks on Ukraine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You can't just revert what you believe to be vandalism, you must also take other reasonable steps, such as WP:RFPP or WP:AIAV. Nicnote^{say hello!}_contribs 15:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicnote : 3RR. Exemptions: 4. Reverting obvious vandalism. This is the usual vandalism, which is now common in all wikipedia with the participation of the ip from RF. Flavius1 (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not. You are engaged in a legitimate content dispute where you abuse your editing privilegies. And your last comment shows the clearly Russophobic agenda that you truly have. 93.159.236.12 (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Topographical cretinism

The article Topographical cretinism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It isn't clear whether this term is actually used or whether this is a hoax. If the term is actually used, references to reliable sources using the term are required to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: I added sources. the phenomenon exists. has many names (synonymy). In Russian, it is better known as topographical cretinism. But for English it is known as "topographical disorientation" Flavius1 (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yalta European Strategy

The article Yalta European Strategy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, refs are press adverts and/or mentions in passing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mother of Rus' cities

Hello, Flavius1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mother of Rus' cities should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother of Rus' cities .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Martial law in Ukraine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Martial law in Ukraine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 16:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martial law in Ukraine has been accepted

Martial law in Ukraine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Home Lander (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Flavius1 (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Martial law in Ukraine

Please format your references better. Never use dates like "26.11.2018" because "1.12.2018" is ambiguous - an American would read it as 12th January. Please add "date retrieved" to all online references, as contents can change. Please be more careful about accuracy: the BBC ref was 27 Nov, not 26 as you have stated. To see the standard format for references in English Wikipedia, look at the work I did on the article before asking for it to be moved back out of draft. Please now clean up the article. Thank you. PamD 23:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]