User talk:Flakinho

Duplicate articles

Please don't create duplicate articles like Restriction enzymes' cutting list and Restriction enzymes cutting' list. Just create the one. If you misspell it the first time, ask for help at WP:Requested Moves and someone will rename it for you. Shadowjams (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Restriction enzymes cutting list

I have nominated Restriction enzymes cutting list, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restriction enzymes cutting list. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your work on the List of freshwater aquarium fish species. HighFlyingFish (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of homing endonuclease cutting sites

Firstly thank you for reporting the error to me. I'll update WP:AWB to add some additional validation around the moving of the references section. Now, the WP standards are for the references section to be before external links, so you'll need to put that back, and add another {{reflist}} at the end of the external links section to show that <ref> by itself. Thanks Rjwilmsi 18:32, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Italic titles

Thanks for italicizing the titles of the Chionodoxa articles I wrote. I didn't know about {{italic title}}, but I do now! In return, I'll try to improve the English in the introduction to list of restriction enzyme cutting sites. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now made some changes to the article; please see the comment on its talk page, as there's one sentence I didn't really understand. (It's all better than my Spanish!) Peter coxhead (talk) 08:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the title is also automatically italicized by removing the name parameter from the taxobox (example [1]). Sometimes that way is doubly helpful, by removing one of many equal 'common' names from the taxobox head and automatically putting the binomial name there. First Light (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: "Bryopsida" is a class, not a genus or species, so this edit to italicize the title is an error. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:00, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Noctuoidea. We have too many errors of this type already, so your algorithm is apparently buggy. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multicolumns

Hello Flakinho,

In regard to your edits with the summary of 'multicolumn', such as this one at Dillenia, they all display as only one column on my system. It was one of the reasons why I formatted them in the way I did (that they worked on my system of WebTV). It seems the longer a page is, the more endless blank space shows, and also they crash my system more often. The latter effect seems to happen more often when the page is very long (scrolling) than how many bytes it uses. Although it will also happen if the page has too many bytes.

I'm sorry for having such a cheap system, but as I am currently unemployed, I can afford nothing else for anytime in the near future. Can we find some better way we can both agree upon? Oh, one more thing: the reason I made the font of species at 2 was that you could fit more into the screen without it appearing too small. Of course, I can only speak of how things look on my screen and not anyone else's.

Anyway, great job with those {{italictitle}}s! Peace, Hamamelis (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Flakinho!

Don't worry about your English, my Spanish is at least a hundred times worse, I wouldn't even try to say more, since I never learned. Using "col-begin" and "col-end", etc. work fine, I've noticed. So, I'll change them where I find them. Yes, it would be crazy if using <small> crashed my system, I just meant when a page becomes longer, the more likely the length of the page would make it crash. There are many such pages on WP that I cannot visit due to this. I was saying, when the fonts are reduced, so is the page's length, naturally. But since <small> is equivelent to <font size=2>, I used that with the species, and used <font size=1> for the species' authors – to be consistant (even though editing the text itself is longer, the page length is shorter).

So, all I would suggest is using "col-begin" and "col-end", etc. in the future, if you don't object to it. Does this sound good(?) and am I making sense?

Peace, Hamamelis (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drosophila

Just to let you know, I removed the species list from the article; it's too bulky as well as very incomplete, and making one better will make the other worse. If you really, really want to include one I suggest making a separate article for it, since it will be very long. You can actually make it fairly quickly by doing a bulk download from TaxoDros, though that will give you a non-standard taxonomy (e.g. with Idiomyia for the Hawaiian species). KarlM (talk) 10:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Solanum lasiocarpum

Thanks for helping me with S. lasiocarpum. My name is William by the way.Cozzycovers (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restriction eznyme cutting sites

		The Bio-star
		Thank you for creating the Restriction eznyme cutting sites page. Keep up the good work and may you be free of deletionism trouble. Squidonius (talk) 22:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the restriction enzyme table. What an incredible amount of work. I really appreciate the effort you put into that. Nick Beeson (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why double?

[2] -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aucoumea

Please don't add {{italic title}} to a redirect, as you did at aucoumea; it causes the redirect to stop functioning as a redirect — and because it's a redirect, most users are never going to directly see the title anyway if it's functioning properly. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 07:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Hello Flakinho, Wilhelmina Will has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Greetings, Flakinho! I hope you have a good day! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 20:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Felicia (plant)

I just saw the PROD there but I didn't delete it as it would seem like a valid redirect to the correct article. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 05:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Bueno, llevaba un tiempo sopesando si pasarme a la wiki-en. Al menos aquí no se discute sobre cursivas y nombres científicos en inglés... Tal vez era el empujoncito que me hacía falta... Saludos, --Dawn08 (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (En wiki-es, Silvia3)[reply]

Uhmmm... tengo la impresion de que me va a costar un tiempecillo volver a la wiki-es. Empece hace dos a/os con mucha ilusion, pero ahora mismo me ha quedado una sensacion amarga que tengo que dejar pasar. Aparte de las cursivas, he visto otros casos que no me han gustado nada. En fin... Saludos, --Dawn08 (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Asteraceae genera

FYI, your call for (expert) attention has been met. Lavateraguy (talk) 18:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ocotea genus in Lauraceae

Hello, how are you? I have edited in Ocotea I saw that you edited it before. Can you help me to edit again Ocotea? Palecloudedwhite wipe out the article over and over again. In any case I thank you it very much. El colaborador dice que mi inglés no es lo bastante bueno. Le agradecería mucho si pudiese usted mirar mi ultima edción en Ocotea y corregirla. Solo he querido colaborar en el mismo y he añadido numerosas referencias que ha borrado sin comprobar ni tan siquiera alegando falta de tiempo. ¿Donde puedo encontrar un botanico o un ornitologo que pueda comprobar el resultado de mi edición? Asi mismo, le agradecería su ayuda en los diversos articulos sobre biodiversidad donde he colaborado. muchas gracias por su atención, quedo a la espera de su respuesta. Curritocurrito (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Baeckea species for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Baeckea species is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Baeckea species until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Gderrin (talk) 02:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]