User talk:Fishdash

May 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Neeya 2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Diff: [1]

Unexplained and arbitrary, cast reordering.
Contravening WP:FILMPLOT by needlessly adding cast members to a plot section. It also doesn't make sense for you to have restored the cast in the plot section in the edit above, but remove it here in a different article. Are you confused?
Your repeated introduction of "in dual roles" creates a needlessly clunky sentence that you then end with a strange need to describe the women as "female leads", which just sounds like we are denigrating women by giving them a lesser rank than a man's lead. It really comes across as unconscious gender bias. You should be aware that this is a problem. You did the same thing here, where Udhayanidhi Stalin is indicated as the star, with Regina Cassandra and Srushti Dange indicated as "female leads", which again seems like unconscious gender bias. Note also that it's redundant to say "the film stars ___ in the lead roles", because generally speaking, "starring" means "lead roles".
Lastly, note that per WP:BRD, when your edit is reverted, your recourse is to open a discussion to seek consensus for change, not to resubmit the content. Resubmission of content is considered disruptive and can result in your editing privileges being interrupted. I'd start discussing more if I were you.

Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Velayudham. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Diff: [2] Stop adding ignorant nonsense like this. You're wasting your own time, and time of people who have to fix this slop. A starring role is a lead role. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neeya 2

If you make the same ignorant changes again at Neeya 2, that I've already educated you about, you will be blocked. You have made multiple mistakes, which isn't a crime, but when you keep doing it and experienced editors have explained why they are problematic, you need to stop making the same edits. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your explanation "this is the correct order" doesn't actually explain where this "correct order" is coming from. Is it coming from your own preference, or is it coming from the film's credits? So I advise you to start using clear English in your edit summaries and explain things in full. So to be clear, stop adding unconscious gender bias to that article, stop adding cast names to the plot section, per WP:FILMPLOT, and stop adding poor, grammatically problematic, redundant language. If you want to fix the spelling of a character's name, feel free. If you want to indicate that an actor played a dual role, feel free, but don't create a clunky sentence that needlessly introduces inequal gender labels and ridiculous repetitive language. What part of "a starring role is a lead role" is confusing to you? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Based on this edit, it appears that you created a new account to resume your disruptive editing. This is not acceptable. If you continue this disruptive and obnoxious behaviour once your block expires, the next block will be for far longer. I strongly recommend you start demonstrating more competence and start listening to editors who know more about community standards, and English, than you do. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've extended your block to indefinite, because of your continued submission of incompetent edits from anonymous IPs and as Dhashwanth Kumaran. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]