User talk:Fishcharlie

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of LuckyLag360 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Rs chen 7754 03:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fishcharlie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't even know who LuckyLag360 is. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines that were linked above and I understand that creating separate Wikipedia accounts is not allowed. I would also be happy to provide more information to prove I'm in no way related to LuckyLag360. Fishcharlie (talk) 04:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given this, your second edit, it's impossible to conclude you are entirely unrelated to LuckyLag360. Yamla (talk) 13:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fishcharlie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry but that is pretty lame. 1 edit on the same page and you classify me as a sock puppet. Although I disagree with that policy and believe it is ridiculous I now understand it. I believe Wikipedia should offer me a second chance as this was one of my first edits. I'm sure every new Wikipedia member makes mistakes. As I said before I don't even know who LuckyLag360 even is. I use a VPN for all web browsing activity. It seems like there is very little proof that I'm the same person as LuckyLag360. Did the IP addresses match or something along those lines? Again if there is any proof or documentation you'd like me to submit I'd be more then happy to prove I'm not LuckyLag360. I'd like a second chance if possible. Thank you. Fishcharlie (talk) 03:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hmm. So a brand new editor makes edits on two completely unrelated topics, and in both cases they coincide with recent editing of a known serial sockpuppeteer, including exactly repeating a reverted edit by the sockpuppeteer. After the new account is blocked, the editor disappears for seven months, and then reappears to request an unblock, which just by chance is immediately after another sockpuppet of the other editor has been blocked. Yes, could be a remarkable set of chance coincidences. A truly remarkable one. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.