User talk:Firestar777

Hank Hanegraaff

Hi. May I suggest that to avoid some conflict on the above page that you provide a reference/link for the quotation that seems to be in dispute for inclusion. I know nothing of the subject matter but, providing references may help resolve the matter better than entering into what some people will see as an edit war. Just my thoughts. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hank Hanegraaff. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism, and in violation of "No Original Research", "Coatracking" of tangential issues (Calvinist/Arminian debate), and Blog-sourcingin Biographies of Living Perons and have been reverted. If you insist on continuing in this behavior, as noted here and above, you risk being temporarily or permanently prevented from editing the Wikipedia.--Lyonscc (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Firestar, your edits are all in violation of WP:NOR, WP:V, etc. If you insist on making these changes w/o discussion (such as inserting the Armenian/Calvin debate where it has nothing to do with the notability of Hanegraff), you will be reported to admins. These are NOT false allegations--Lyonscc (talk) 12:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Example 1 - you wrote -

His statement about God being a cosmic rapist is also a logical fallacy as it it universally accepted that to love a person is not forcing that love on them nor is a parent or anyone classified as a rapist for loving someone who doesn't want that love. For example, a parent would not be considered a rapist for loving their child if the child was hating them at the same time.

This is an example of a direct violation of the wikipedia policy on no original research.

A person's biography page is not the place upon which to fight your theological battles.--Lyonscc (talk) 12:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Example 2 - you wrote -

Hank has identified himself as an Arminian by various statements such as the one below made on his Bible Answer Man call in radio show on February, 4, 2000:

God is neither a cosmic rapist who forces his love on people, nor is he a cosmic puppeteer who forces people to love him. Instead God grants us the freedom of choice.

He also repeated this in an article he wrote.[1]

In matter of fact, HH did NOT identify himself as an Arminian - this is something you are inferring (a violation of WP:NOR). Additionally, HH is not notable for his choice (or lack thereof) of systematic theology. Inserting this debate is a form of coatracking, and is in violation of [[WP:BLP]|Biographies of Living Persons]] and WP:NPOV.--Lyonscc (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn against, and report vandalism. Your report was not a case of obvious vandalism, and as a result, the user has not been blocked and the request may have been removed from the page. Next time please use Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for reporting a complex abuse or refer to Wikipedia:Resolving disputes if you have a dispute with the user. Thank you. Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 10:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)