User talk:Firefly462

SSP

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Oxyman42 (2nd). Thank you. MickMacNee (talk) 06:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

re Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets#Oxyman42. LessHeard vanU (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Firefly462 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why have I been blocked, for reasons not related to me

Decline reason:

I went and looked through your edits and Oxyman's and I support LessHeard's conclusion that you are a classic sock of Oxyman. For a supposedly brand-new user, you seem to know an awful lot, write similarly, and share the same very particular interests as Oxyman. Stay in the drawer. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.