User talk:Finplanwiki

Welcome

Hi Finplanwiki,

Just wanted to say I noticed some of your good contributions to Wikipedia. Keep it up. Ottawahitech (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Michael Kitces, Finplanwiki!

Wikipedia editor Modern.Jewelry.Historian just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I toned it down a bit. WP is not an online resume or financial planner advertising service.

To reply, leave a comment on Modern.Jewelry.Historian's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks Modern.Jewelry.Historian. This is only my third time trying to create a Wiki bio, still learning how to do it right.

I do think the part about NexGen should stay in though. It's part of why Kitces is known in my industry.

Nomination of Michael Kitces for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kitces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kitces until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Roth IRA

Hi. I removed your contribution to Roth IRA, and posted on the talk page my reasons. [1] You need to provide a reliable source which mentions that this is a potential caveat. I don't mean to offend Michael Kitces, but a blog by Michael Kitces is not a reliable source. As an aside, if (big IF) Michael Kitces was to add material to this article and then use his own blog as a reference then this would be a self-published source which is even more problematic: not only is it original research in terms of the content that he added, but he would also be engaging in self-promotion. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick^t 22:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 18:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marv Tuttle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marv Tuttle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marv Tuttle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]