User talk:Finkpal

Belated welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Finkpal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 05:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is your point or your question?

if any state here; I have no questionnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! f..... yOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.2.74 (talk) 10:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is my opinion;
WHAT IS CREATIVE COMMONS?

Creative Commons helps you share your knowledge and creativity with the world.

Creative Commons develops, supports, and stewards legal and technical

infrastructure that maximizes digital creativity, sharing, and innovation.

Our mission

Creative Commons develops, supports, and stewards legal and technical infrastructure that maximizes digital creativity, sharing, and innovation.

Our vision

Our vision is nothing less than realizing the full potential of the Internet — universal access to research and education, full participation in culture — to drive a new era of development, growth, and productivity.

Wikipedia by deleting any article without consent from the author does breach the creative common contract between the author and Wikipedia. By this act and upon the law they have no rights to hold in these possessions of any article, which belong to this author, unless some other contract has been concluded to the satisfaction of both party, the author as a donor and the Wikipedia as a beneficiary.
There are no needs to print and sign such contract. Upon the United States Court order such contract does exist, and binding both party as long as both party does accept commitment binding all of the party to such or specified contract.
By contract done between the Wikipedia and any author, it shall be understandable that the author does provide these works as a “donor” for the benefit of Wikipedia, and it shall be don upon free and not of any force artist work in the manner, the author does believe to be in the best of his knowledge and ability. Wikipedia as a beneficiary of the author work, and upon a contract shall provide further assistance to the author as a party of the creative common agreement. If for any reason such agreement cannot be reach, Wikipedia then shall have no rights what so ever to exhibits of any work done by the author, unless some other contract has been closed upon agreement between the author and Wikipedia. Wikipedia shall evaluate work of any author and upon the specified contract, it shall be accepted as a donation don by the author as a donor to Wikipedia.
http://creativecommons.org/
http://creativecommons.org/about
http://creativecommons.org/policies
http://creativecommons.org/contact

Finkpal (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in contacting Wikipedia. Before proceeding, some important disclaimers: Wikipedia has no central editorial board; contributions are made by a large number of volunteers at their own discretion. Edits are not the responsibility of the Wikimedia Foundation (the organisation that hosts the site) nor of its staff. Although Wikipedia was founded by Jimmy Wales, he is not personally responsible for our content. If you have questions about the concept of Wikipedia rather than a specific problem, the About Wikipedia page may help. The links on the left should direct you to how to contact us or resolve problems. If you cannot find your issue listed there, please email us at info-enwikimedia.org .

blame me; — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.75.129 (talk) 15:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Finckenstein coat of arms, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Finckenstein coat of arms was changed by Finkpal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910536 on 2011-01-28T00:23:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Von Roggenhausen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Von Roggenhausen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 10:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sphinx Family

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Sphinx Family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Orange Mike | Talk 00:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012: Problematic editing patterns

Hello and welcome. I have added a very belated welcome at the top of this page, which includes links to key Wikipedia policies. Please review them before adding new material. While some of your edits appear to be constructive, others are unsourced and are therefore unacceptable under numerous policies. I strongly encourage you to read all the pages linked in the welcome above before adding any more materials. This will reduce the chances that your work will be deleted. If you continue to add unsourced materials as discussed in the links above, you may be blocked or banned. If you have any questions, please send me a note or reply here. Thank you. 05:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Jokestress (talk)

Category:Sphinx Family

Hi Finkpal. I've proposed this category for deletion as I don't think it meets Wikipedia's standards. However, you are welcome to join the discussion here. My view is that, even if there were a confirmed connexion between all these articles, there may be better ways of linking them. E.g. there are already list pages for the surnames which could be developed. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Von Roggenhausen, you may be blocked from editing. Gyrofrog (talk) 14:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You get me on!!!! see you at court. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.75.129 (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. (See 86.168.75.129 (talk)) Gyrofrog (talk) 15:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you do believe that this is a threat. It is up to you, for your knowledge the process does started, and it will be long before it reaches the court, because first a settlement has to be done. But bet me on; see you there unless a settlement is agreed.Finkpal (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Gyrofrog (talk) 15:46, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you then the one who got the power, at least for now. In eastern part of Europe these governments for 100 years had the power. Today officially this is a history. I believe that you are the one who do live in the United Kingdom of Great Britain, and only for that reason you need some correction. If you want to play cards on yours rules then go Russia. Within jurisdiction of the Kings of Great Britain, we play cards upon the law. You do forcing people to certain behavior. It is illegal in the United Kingdom of GB to Discriminate others base these view on these work, a specially, that you as Wikipedia depending on them. FINKPAL 86.182.0.226 (talk) 18:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henryk Vincke von Monzingen

Hello Finkpal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Henryk Vincke von Monzingen for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Lockley (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello lockely!!! - Or whoever you are. You want to delete be my guest. If you want more info on Henry, be in touch to this web page; https://sites.google.com/site/vonsphinxfamily/updates I will not work on Wikipedia until all the mess be cleared. Any way I wish for you the best. Finkpal86.144.1.23 (talk) 08:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]