User talk:Finally An Account

Look, for a long time I wished to remain an IP, the only reason I made an account was for user scripts (I have been editing as an IP for 3 months+ ).Finally An Account (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is my 158^th account LOL!Finally An Account (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finally An Account, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Finally An Account! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tedickey. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TEDickey (talk) 21:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Logging out might stop the script TEDickey (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you account until you are able to provide an explanation as to why you were making multiple disruptive (script?) edits to article and user talk pages. Your intent may very well to be helpful, but the execution is causing wide-spread disruption.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Finally An Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was that stupid script, though I am experienced in js, I had no idea how wikipedia handles it. The result was that the script was executed automatically rather than at button click. Finally An Account (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per your agreement to seek assistance prior to running any additional scripts I have unblocked your account. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blanked the scripts - do you agree to seek assistance prior to attempting any further scripts? --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have already learned the basics of wikipedia functions, I will continue to learn and I agree to test all script in user-space before even thinking of mainspace. I will indeed seek assistance.Finally An Account (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-blocked

Hello, Finally an Account. Per your recent conversations on the Village Pump and the IRC help channel, I have re-blocked your account. You were unblocked with the understanding that you would seek assistance before attempting to run scripts again; instead, you have set about doing your best to use scripts to evade API limits, despite repeated attempts by other users to explain to you that your behavior was, at best, not helpful and, at worst, threatening to Wikipedia's servers. This is an encyclopedia, not a scripting environment, and while we allow - and welcome - our users writing scripts to assist in editing the encyclopedia, you do not seem to be here to contribute to the encyclopedia in any fashion. If you want to practice your coding skills, I would recommend that you sign up at a site like Codecademy rather than continuing to amuse yourself here. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Finally An Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What do you mean "threatening to Wikipedia's servers"! I have done no such thing... If I am not unblocked by tomorrow I will more accounts.Finally An Account (talk) 20:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Threatening to create sockpuppets isn't going to get you unblocked. Legoktm (talk) 20:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Re:wp:ani, there are no restrictions on the number of accounts I can back. If you dont want me making more accounts, why not impose some restrictions.Finally An Account (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be making more accounts,actually but please kindly unblock me.Finally An Account (talk) 20:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Finally An Account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just unblock me and I will not be writing any more scripts. Actually Just rangeblock me so that I can't make any more accounts.Finally An Account (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason to unblock, plus a desire to remain blocked. Huon (talk) 20:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.