User talk:FilmiWeekly
Welcome
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/New-Bouncywikilogo.gif/50px-New-Bouncywikilogo.gif)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Re: My page Justin John
[edit]Pages aren't owned by anybody. Secondly, the "news sources" you're referencing here are clearly non-neutral, and most certainly don't quality as reliable sources. LFaraone 23:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've deleted the article since it met several of the criteria in our rules for speedy deletion, and there wasn't anything neutral to salvage from the article. Please familiarise yourself with our biographies of living persons policy if you decide to recreate this article or edit other biographies. LFaraone 23:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, FilmiWeekly. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nati, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- The article you wrote does not meet the notability criteria for films. Find more about it here: Wikipedia:Notability (films). Read this first, before You make any complains. The article will not be deleted for at least a week, so you have enough time to read it and improve the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Close paraphrasing
[edit]Hi there, re: this, I advise you to be very careful moving forward about how you present content, since the content you submitted is a very close paraphrasing of the source material. This could easily be construed a copyright violation. Also, you should brush up on your understanding of our Manual of Style, since you seem to be randomly italicising things. And finally, phrases like "tie the knot" are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. We don't use slang, we use clear, professional phrasing. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your inputs. I will be sure and careful in my next edits. FilmiWeekly (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)