Jump to content

User talk:Filippos2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Filippos2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Solipsist 07:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


WOW

[edit]

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:World of Warcraft for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 15:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:World of Warcraft for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 19:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:World of Warcraft for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. --Fogeltje 09:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ADDICTION to WOW WOW MUST change it's policy by logging off users that have been logged for 4 hours long and not accepting them for another 4 hours period.

There are some clinics for fanatic players of WOW.

These are NOT inappropriate comments.

You should be blocked for trying to hide truth.

Yes, there are some people addicted in WoW. This is already discussed in the article. There is a big sections about criticism and controversy over WoW. There is a whole article about that, with a section only about addiction! Do you at least read that? If you think this is somewhat still not good enough, you sould try to improve this.
But WOW MUST change it's policy by doing what I think is a good idea is not "truth", in any sense I know. It's just an opinion. YOUR opinion.
Wikipedia is not about what YOU think is right. Wikipedia is not for your original research. It is not a discussion forum. It is not a soapbox. It is not a blog.
We don't care if you have a idea for resolving some problem you see in anything.
Wikipedia must be neutral. We can't just say what is truth. We need verifiability.
Do you have a source to support what you call "the truth"? So, sorry, for saying this, but please, stop making disruptive edits in articles and talk pages. Thanks. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 15:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to World of Warcraft, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. wildie · wilđ di¢e · wilł die 11:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note about deletion of your recent article

[edit]

The article KiX PBX has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --barneca (talk) 06:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KiX PBX

[edit]

What do you need help with? If you read some of the links in your welcome message above, and WP:FIRST, and WP:SPAM, and still have a specific question, please let me know. Most of what you need to know is in there, it can be a bit of a chore decoding it sometimes. Basically, an article needs reliable sources, and needs to be written from a neutral point of view. --barneca (talk) 01:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not refactor your talk comments like you did here. Instead if you have written something that you regret strike the comment out by using <s></s> and write a new comment below the answer to your first comment. --Saddhiyama (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Here's to You (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

23:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)