User talk:Filikovalo

Nice spider article

Good to see your article at Philoponella congregabilis; we need more spider editors. Keep up the good work! If I can advise or help in any way, leave me a message on my talk page. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your remarks. Sorry I misidentified the spider image previously attached. I've seen community nests of Philoponella congregabilis nearby, but mistook the spider for the similar Zosis geniculatus. I'm currently searching for an opportunity to photograph Philoponella congregabilis. No success as yet. They are mostly brownish in colour, not grey. There's plenty of spiders here nearby which need articles. I'll get proper ID from the Australian Museum next time. Filikovalo (talk) 01:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, spider identification is often difficult, and I'm doubtful of quite a few images in Commons. In most cases you need to look at a dead specimen with a binocular microscope. I have to say that even then I can't always match what I see with the diagrams in books! So if you can upload reliably identified spider images, it would very useful to the project. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Asplenium difforme) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Asplenium difforme, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor Jimfbleak just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

copyedited

To reply, leave a comment on Jimfbleak's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Flint & Steel Guesthouse) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Flint & Steel Guesthouse, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor Damibaru just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Too bad the Guesthouse was destroyed... It might be better however to use the reference tool in the under "Cite" in the edit toolbar when citing your sources. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Damibaru's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Aristotelia australasica) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aristotelia australasica, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor Erick Shepherd just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good! But is it edible?

To reply, leave a comment on Erick Shepherd's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Quintinia verdonii has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Filikovalo. Quintinia verdonii, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Quintinia verdonii

On 11 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quintinia verdonii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the grey possumwood can be a desirable garden plant on account of its flowers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quintinia verdonii. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Quintinia verdonii), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:52, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Musgraveia sulciventris has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Filikovalo. Musgraveia sulciventris, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Musgraveia sulciventris

On 28 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Musgraveia sulciventris, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the bronze orange bug (pictured) can spray a stinky liquid at a target up to 60 centimetres (24 in) away? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Musgraveia sulciventris. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Musgraveia sulciventris), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Filikovalo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Clausena brevistyla) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Clausena brevistyla, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good, thanks. I've put a tag on the talk page. I hoped I could link to a Wikispecies page, but it doesn't seem to have one.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Homalanthus novoguineensis) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Homalanthus novoguineensis, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Leionema dentatum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Leionema dentatum, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good. I've added a few more sources and a taxon bar, put a tag on the talk page and linked to Wikipedia articles in other languages.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Filikovalo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stink bug australia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stink bug australia. Since you had some involvement with the Stink bug australia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 09:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are many types of insects in the world known as "stink bugs". The common name "bronze orange bug" is not common at all, and in my experienced never used by Australian gardeners. The purpose of this redirect is for Australian users to find information regarding this insect. Without it (and the scientific name), there is little or no way for an Australian enquirer to find the page. They would need to go to a web browser search for "Australia" and "stink bug", then find the scientific name, and then put that into Wikipedia. In other words, without this redirect, the potential readers may never find this page. There's too many different non Australian references in Wikipedia for "stink bug" for the average user to find the correct page. If a Wikipedia editor is aware of a better way for an enquirer to find Musgraveia sulciventris, then please employ it on Wikipedia. Remember, that the average user would not know the scientific name and would not be aware of the term "bronze orange bug" Filikovalo (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Long Reef (New South Wales)

Please see discussion on your DYK nomination at WT:DYK#Prep 1 - shipwrecks. Yoninah (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your interest in Long Reef, Filikovalo (talk) 22:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Long Reef (New South Wales)

On 11 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Long Reef (New South Wales), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bulgosuchus gargantua, a giant early temnospondyl from the Triassic, is known only from Long Reef, New South Wales? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Long Reef (New South Wales). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Long Reef (New South Wales)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 32 of this article appears to be a broken link. Gatoclass (talk) 01:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for letting me know. Now adjusted. Filikovalo (talk) 03:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Philotheca reichenbachii) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Philotheca reichenbachii, Filikovalo!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Any additional info to add to this stub?

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 04:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC) thank you. I'll try to find more info online and expand the article later Filikovalo (talk) 04:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Echinopogon caespitosus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Echinopogon caespitosus.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Interesting article and good work with it. I've replaced the non-existent category representing the plant's genus with a more general currently-existing subfamily category.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 23:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC) thank you for your assistance and kind remarks. I'm considering doing another stub on a plant Brunoniella australis. However, the genus has disappeared from Wikipedia. Can you point me to the most up to date name? (Q15351273) Filikovalo (talk) 23:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rytidosperma tenuius) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rytidosperma tenuius.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

You might like to consider adding Plinthanthesis tenuior as the basionym (see IPNI). Further info here, too (albeit a commercial site): https://www.victoriannativeseed.com.au/?product=wallaby-grass

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your interest. I don't think that website is worthy of citation. It's a commercial website, not a science based website. However, I have added this Danthonia purpurascens, Vickery as a synonym. Filikovalo (talk) 04:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Filikovalo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

australian biota

moist areas is useful, but it would be very helpful from any data about plants if you could specify regions or states, Australia is a big place, thanks.... JarrahTree 06:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You try to find more information about liverworts and their habitat, it's not easy to find. Filikovalo (talk) 07:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lepidosperma viscidum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lepidosperma viscidum.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Please assist with the species box/taxobox with the new article Ptilothrix deusta Filikovalo (talk) 07:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Gahnia erythrocarpa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gahnia erythrocarpa.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 11:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Leucopogon esquamatus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Leucopogon esquamatus.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 06:45, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pultenaea blakelyi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pultenaea blakelyi.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 06:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pultenaea villosa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pultenaea villosa.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eucalyptus brunnea

Hello Filikovalo,

Thanks for your work. The edits you have written to the species Hibiscus macilwraithensis, Dillwynia elegans, Hibiscus tozerensis, Gossia floribunda and Stenocarpus davallioides, are great articles and all are listed as accepted names by the Australian Plant Census ("APC"). (Only Gossia floribunda is accepted at the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families("WCSP") because that list only includes "selected" families.) However, I do not agree with your last edit to Eucalyptus deanei.

The only hope we have of working out which Australian species are "accepted species" is those two lists, APC and WCSP. Eucalyptus brunnea is not listed in either of them. I appreciate that you have contacts at the National Herbarium of New South Wales, but the website "plantNet" has not been updated for many years. It is one of those "outdated references on the internet" to which you refer. The botanists you refer to may say "Wikipedia is "very poor" in not recognising this species" but we have to rely on a published authority and the authority is the WCSP or the APC.

It is true that The Plant List includes Eucalyptus brunnea as an accepted species^[1] but clicking on the link (record 72573) returns Eucalyptus brunnea as a synonym of Eucalyptus deanei, the same result as for the APC.^[2]

In your edit to the Eucalyptus deanei article you have included the phrases "many leading sources" and "other scientists" without identifying any of them. In your references, you listed:

Dean Nicolle, but without any published reference to your claim that he supports E. brunnea as a separate species;
Ken Hill at the RBGS, who retired 14 years ago;
"Joel Cohen, Gavin Phillips and others at the New South Wales Herbarium", but that is not a reliable source because their opinion is not published (see WP:CS);
a reference to the Australian Plant Name Index ("APNI") but it lists "all names, whether current names, synonyms or invalid names" and at present, E. brunnea is a synonym.

If there is something I have missed and you have reliable, published references for your claim, please let me know. (Here is fine.) Gderrin (talk) 10:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have contributed to other articles without responding to this, I hope you will not object to my removing your reference to "many leading sources" and "other scientists". Gderrin (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Eucalyptus brunnea". The Plant List. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Note that this website has been superseded by World Flora Online
^ "Eucalyptus deanei". Australian Plant Census. Retrieved 1 November 2019.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Great job on Arkys cornutus - keep it up! Meatsgains^(talk) 02:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Filikovalo

Thank you for creating Onthophagus dandalu.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Wow, what a beautiful image for this new stub. Any info on that colouring and what causes it that we can add to the article?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I can't find much info on dung beetles, nor in particular about this one. I'll have another look and try to add more to the article Filikovalo (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Halfordia kendack

Hello Filikovalo,

I noticed your edit to Halfordia kendack (thanks!), so thinking that page is probably on your watchlist I'm advising as follows. Halfordia kendack is the only species in the genus Halfordia according to the Australian Plant Census^[1] and Plants of the World Online^[2] (although there are problems with the latter, since it lists the distribution as New Caledonia, not Australia!). My intention is to swap the pages Halfordia and Halfordia kendack, then create a redirect from the latter to the former so that there is only one page about Halfordia, that describes the one species (as required here). It's a tricky process. Just asking for your patience until it's complete. Gderrin (talk) 03:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Halfordia". Australian Plant Census. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
^ "Halfordia". Plants of the World Online. Retrieved 21 July 2020.

OK, I started that article under a different name. I'd be wary of your sources. I go by the National Herbarium of New South Wales. They are the authority on this species. Unwise Wikipedia editors have made errors with NSW plant species. Such as Eucalyptus brunnea, which is an accepted and correct species. Editors use references are out of date and incorrect. Filikovalo (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Josepha Duschek into Bella mia fiamma, addio. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bella mia fiamma, addio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bella mia fiamma, addio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mozartschildren.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/bella-mia-fiamma-addio-3-november-1787/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 12:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bella mia fiamma, addio, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ceres and Alpheus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for peer review help

Hi Filikovalo. I hope you are doing well and staying safe during these times! Apologize to bother and posting a random request. I have just started to work on a stub (Fontainea Venosa) (the one you created a while ago!) and had added some sections. I am trying my best to get the article to B class hopefully. Knowing your expertise, I would love if you can help me to review and left a comment on what I can do to improve my edits. I hope that this is okay, but no pressure if you are busy. That is completely fine and understandable :) Hope to hear from you soon. The article is Fontainea Venosa

Thank you so much :) Sparklingkull (talk) 06:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your excellent work on Fontainea venosa. I tend to write stubs in Wikipedia, and don't often try to enlarge them or get them upgraded myself. Your best ally in getting assistance is getting in contact with the editor Casliber. He is most experienced and helpful in these matters. I see he has already made edits. Good luck.Filikovalo (talk) 01:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citing the Australian Tropical Rainforest Key (RFK)

Hi Filikovalo, just a heads-up for you. I notice you've created some articles recently which cite an outdated version (i.e. edition 7) of the RFK. Edition 8 was published late last year, and you can find it here. It only has a small number of changes to ed.7 but I imagine that some time in the future the older version will be taken offline, so ed.8 is a better source to use. Cheers — Junglenut | talk 00:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Balta (cockroach) - move to Balta (genus)?

Hi Filikovalo. It would appear to me reasonable enough to move this to its name as a genus rather than a more generic term "Cockroach", which includes any number of other ordos, families, and genera. Your thoughts about this? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, a good idea. Please do so.Filikovalo (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just did it. Leomk0403 (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 11:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Hi Filikovalo. I'm reminding you about my earlier post on this page about citing the Australian Tropical Rainforest Key as I've noticed you created a new article for Larsenaikia jardinei and cited the outdated version of RFK. Please refer to the latest edition of the key when adding references, for reasons which should be obvious. The link to RFK v.8 is in my earlier message but I'll repeat it here - RFK v.8 — Junglenut | talk 14:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Hi, I don't mind what reference I use, as long as the information in it is correct. Filikovalo (talk) 21:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Filikova: Your reply indicates a lazy and simplistic approach to your editing method. When we cite a source that has a succession of improvements, the most recent version is the obvious one to use. If you don't understand that you shouldn't be editing. — Junglenut | talk 13:30, 1 November 2021 (UTC) You have been reported. Your remark is incorrect. Filikovalo (talk) 02:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Filikovalo: It appears that RFK7 has now been taken offline as predicted, so the point is now mute. It may still show up in searches for a little while but there will be no info available in the links provided. So again, please refer to RFK8 for any Australian tropical rainforest flora. Cheers — Junglenut | talk 11:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Platycephalus endrachtensis

On 17 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Platycephalus , which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the specific epithet of Platycephalus endrachtensis is from an old word for Australia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Platycephalus endrachtensis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Platycephalus endrachtensis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Sorry forgot to mention you.Leomk0403 (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 02:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Actephila grandifolia is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Stanwell Park Claystone is a really good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Pavetta australiensis is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Proiphys cunninghamii is another very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boonjee satinash

Thanks for the article - you could maybe pop a project tag on the talk page? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Filikovalo, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 04:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. As mentioned before, I've been an editor since 2008 under different names. These days, I'm only interested in doing stubs. There's usually no shortage of new subjects, it's just up to me to get motivated.Filikovalo (talk) 06:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peripentadenia mearsii

Hi @Filikovalo, the subject page which you created today (10 March 2024) contained two wiki templates, i.e. Template:Use Australian English and Template:Use dmy dates, and both of them were dated September 2023. Maybe this is because you used an earlier saved version of your new article, or maybe you're using a local template for new pages. In either case, please check your edits/creations prior to publishing them and ensure that all details are correct. Cheers, Steve Junglenut |Talk 13:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[TPL-1] "Eucalyptus brunnea". The Plant List. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Note that this website has been superseded by World Flora Online

[APC-2] "Eucalyptus deanei". Australian Plant Census. Retrieved 1 November 2019.

[APC-3] "Halfordia". Australian Plant Census. Retrieved 21 July 2020.

[POWO-4] "Halfordia". Plants of the World Online. Retrieved 21 July 2020.

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]