User talk:Fight the Clique

Welcome!

Hello, Fight the Clique! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you so much! I am a very fast reader and I have read many of those links. I really appreciate the friendly greeting! Fight the Clique (talk) 02:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:NCdave, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 02:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fight the Clique. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Yours, Corvus cornix_talk 02:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

The user whose talk page that is usually does the archiving, unless he/she leaves it to a bot. Unless I am mistaken, you are not that user. As to the barnstar, I couldn't just restore what I wanted to, so I'm afraid that had to be reverted. If you would like, you may reward him/her another barnstar, and (as long as it doesn't come with an archiving of the talk page) it will not be reverted. I hope that helps, Basketball110 _{pick away...} 02:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are able to revert to just the barnstar. Just revert to [1] version. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Basketball110. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 02:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly Corvus cornix. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unblock please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fight the Clique (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock of NCDave, See WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK, no grounds for block. Mentos is scrambling to come up with a reason to justify this unjustifiable block. Thanks. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious sockpuppet. No WP:RFCU as you request, which you sure are familiar with awfully fast, because it wouldn't be granted in a case like this. Mango juice^talk 03:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Metros not WP:AGF, no WP:RFCU, I am not User:NCdave

Metros (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has no reason to believe that I am NCDave. NCDave doesn't have advanced template knowledge. Give NCDave back his barnstar for crying out loud. Do an WP:RFCU and then Metros can apologize for not WP:AGF. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, tell us, how do you know NCDave? --Golbez (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the recent history for the film Expelled, and saw that the clique was picking on him. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert NCdave's talk page to the pre-archive barnstar version. Thanks. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock again

Also, this edit by Metros (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is unacceptable. And the blocking admin just reviewed the block? What's next? Metros needs to be sanctioned. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the block? That's clearly not true. Metros (talk) 03:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fight the Clique (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

review from objective admin please, see above request.Fight the Clique (talk) 03:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'd have to agree; you're violating our policies on abusing multiple accounts. — krimpet ✽ 03:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And, for the record, before extending NCdave's block

you really should do an RFCU.

The world is watching, Metros. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope the world has better things to do with their lives than watch your pleas. Metros (talk) 03:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is science. Will be documented and published. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to give Mackan79 (talk · contribs · count) a barnstar for his honesty: [2]. Thanks. Fight the Clique (talk) 03:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]