User talk:FictionalCharacterGuy

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page James May worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. a_man_alone (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

my userpge?

Hi. Can you clarify why you are making unwanted, and unexplained, changes to my userpage? a_man_alone (talk) 22:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Chris Griffin. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. / edg ☺ ☭ 11:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to write edit summaries for all of your edits. Spidey104 14:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brian Griffin with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 22:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your recent edits have been reverted. Writing an edit summary would help other editors to understand what you're trying to do so we can explain why you shouldn't do it. Also, look at the pages you've edited to see what edits of yours are reverted so you know not to make the same mistakes again. Thanks and best wishes! Spidey104 14:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have a cookie

This WikiCookie is for all the minor edits you made helping to clean up List of Malcolm in the Middle characters. That page has been needing some attention for a while.
Thatotherperson (talk/contribs) 08:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning some of your edits

Hi FictionalCharacterGuy. Edits such as this suggest that you have not yet taken in the guidelines at WP:OVERLINK. Many of your edits are being reverted, some due to linking of common countries, some for other reasons such as needlessly switching between national varieties of grammar such as here. Please, if you have questions, do ask. You don't appear to be using talk pages at all, even when other editors are trying to help you out. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also XxXDylanWillard (talk · contribs) and DylanA.Willard-Jones (talk · contribs). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to make edits (example) that ignore the advice offered about wikilinking at WP:OVERLINK, you are ignoring the concerns raised on your talk page, and other editors are having to clean up after you. This is very much the same pattern as with the other two blocked editors noted above. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I'm really, really, sorry I really am. I have a question what is Wikipdia sock puppet?

Sock puppet - just search, and ye shall find. a_man_alone (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And sorry I did not ask you more directly: are you the user of the DylanWillard accounts? Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I thought they were the Examples?

Their edits are very similar to yours. Can I ask, do you understand why I've undone many of your edits, such as these: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ? Some of your edits are fine, but there are way too many that are not in keeping with our guidelines. Do you understand the reasons? Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I guess I jumped in to Wikipedia to quick.

You've just made another large series of edits (again with no edit summaries) which indicate you are still too willing to jump in with mass edits without first understanding guidelines on wikilinks. Do you understand that you will be blocked from editing if you continue with this behaviour? I'm sorry it's come to this. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was frankly pointless. You changed the formatting for no good reason, and the wikilink for her place of birth to a disambig page. (I presume you intended it to link here.) And, surprisingly enough, no edit summary either. In fact, I note that you've never used an edit summary in any of your edits, nor are you signing your posts with the required tildes - ~~~~. Why is this? You are also not answering simple questions - do you understand that your current behaviour is likely to get you blocked? a_man_alone (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I've blocked you, as per the above discussion. You have continued, including edit warring at Tessa James. You do not appear to be understanding what is asked of you. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also ask you not to create a new account to avoid this block. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:23, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]