User talk:Fernandoricardo8039

Fernandoricardo8039, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fernandoricardo8039! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fernando8039, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--Animalparty! (talk) 17:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Fernando8039. EdJohnston (talk) 18:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fernandoricardo8039 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my only account i do not understand this ban. Fernandoricardo8039 (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In reviewing this matter, I cannot believe that this is a coincidence. If the other account isn't yours, which I doubt, you're going to have to explain your relationship to it. 331dot (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fernandoricardo8039 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand this connection with another account i have only used this account i am quite annoyed this has happened. Fernandoricardo8039 (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 12:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another administrator will review this request, but can you at least understand why others would think "Fernando8039" and "Fernandoricardo8039" are the same person? 331dot (talk) 10:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=This is my only account i have used on Wikipedia, i have done nothing but be honest and reference information that i submit.}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fernandoricardo8039 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand this issue, this is the only ever account used on wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nobody here is stupid enough to believe that Fernando8039 (talk · contribs) and Fernandoricardo8039 (talk · contribs) aren't the same person. If you want to be unblocked, you're going to have to go back to your original account and make your case there. —DoRD (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|i not have another account, i don't understand all this.

I have now removed your talk page access. As stated above, you will need to go back to your original account and request to be unblocked from there. You can also use WP:UTRS, but you would need to make a substantially different request than those above in order to be heard there. 331dot (talk) 15:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]