Jump to content

User talk:Fernando S. Aldado~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Fernando S. Aldado~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SoothingR 21:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, estou muito alegre de ver-lhe aqui. Eu tento aproveitar-me de cada oportunidade a falar com um luso-falante (estava ensinando-me este língua por seis meses, e eu creio que posso dizer que estou escrevendo melhor...ou talvez). Bem-vindo à Wikipédia inglesa - estou seguro que você for um colaborador excelente! εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 06:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perdão, você já é um colaborador excelente (estava aqui por quase três meses). Desculpa-me pelos erros que faço, por favor. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 06:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tenha uma estrelinha também. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 06:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for your kind words on my talk page. Sorry, I don't know how to respond in Portugeuse, but good luck to Brazil at the World Cup this summer :) Nach0king 09:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preciso de sua ajuda

[edit]

Oi, senhor. Acabo de traduzir o artigo do “Duque de Caxias” da Wikipédia portuguesa, mais eu vejo que temos um problema, pq o artigo foi copiado palavra por palavra de acordacidadao.hpg.ig.com.br. Então, houve uma violação dos direitos autorais na Wikipédia lusófona. Não creio que o artigo no inglês tenha o mesmo problema, devido que eu escrevi cada palavra com minhas próprias idéias e com uma forma diferente. Vc pode me ajudar! O português não é meu idioma materno, então, ainda cometo alguns erros – talvez vc possa buscar erros que eu cometesse no artigo que eu escrevi aqui, se quiser.

Vejo que há muitas violações do direitos autorais na pt.wp. Isto é um problema que os admins. lá têm que eliminar.

Espero que escrevesse tudo bem. Não se ria, ainda estou aprendindo o idioma! :-) NOVO-REI 04:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Obrigado, vc pode responder em português! NOVO-REI 20:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Electrogoth

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Electrogoth, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrogoth. Thank you.TheDarknessVisible 19:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

[edit]

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nietzsche (short film)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nietzsche (short film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 02:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

23:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

12:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nietzsche (film)

[edit]

The article Nietzsche (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]