Jump to content

User talk:Female bodybuilder enthusiast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Female bodybuilder enthusiast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sock-puppet Latitude0116. Never even heard of this user. Compare my editing history with Latitude0116. We aren't the same. This is a case of mistaken identity. Please unblock.

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Female bodybuilder enthusiast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Female bodybuilder enthusiast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please I beg you. This is my original Wikipedia account from 2012 when I began editing 8 years ago. I am not Latitude0116, I am User:AHC300. As you can see below I tried everything I could to convince the admins I wasn't Latitude0116. I just want to return to my orginal wikipedia account and return to editing as I have done 13,000 times now over the course of 8 years. I am crying right now. I was a teenager in 2012. This is completely unfair that this has gone on so long for me and Latitude0116. Whatever it was that he did in 2012 should not be held responsible for me in 2021. I will do whatever the admins demand. Please close all of my other accounts. I just want to use this one and go back to the wiki community. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You make an unblock request nearly 8 years after being unblocked, but only days after being mentioned here, and after unblock requests from other socks? Sorry, I don't accept that that is coincidental. Request declined. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Female bodybuilder enthusiast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Voice of Clam you are simply either misinformed, I was NOT unblocked ever from this account. I was banned PERMANENTLY from day ONE! What do you WANT FROM ME?! You just want me permanently banned no matter what I do. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Female bodybuilder enthusiast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So I should never be allowed to edit here again because some admin 10 years ago thought I was someone else and I should suffer the consequences forever? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 20:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request, and you've wasted enough time here already. Yamla (talk) 21:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not accuse me of lying. You have admitted to being a sock-puupet of AHC300, who is currently blocked. Therefore this is simply block evasion. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 20:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You do not even know the history of me. This account was ACCUSED FALSELY of being a sock puppet originally. So what are you saying? Stay banned forever? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Nomination of Twisted Sisters (2010 film) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twisted Sisters (2010 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Sisters (2010 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 01:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 45084

[edit]

UTRS appeal #45084 is now open. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per UTRS, will have TPA restored for appeal to WP:AN. Will likely need WP:TBAN on zoophilia, broadly construed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Female bodybuilder enthusiast, you are expected to follow the steps given in WP:UNBAN, taking into account Deepfriedokra's advice above. --Yamla (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will comply fully with your directives. Is there anything else I need to do? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 12:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you need to make the specific request which will be carried over to the noticeboard, as per WP:UNBAN. --Yamla (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question, how exactly do I do this again? Do I just make a new section on my talk page unblock requesting this? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure this is what you want your unblock request to be? Because I will reject it. Instead of declining your unblock request I am going to give you another chance. You need to follow the instructions given to you. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 12:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not 100% sure what to do next. I went to WP:UNBAN. It says "Post an appeal unblock template or comment there, by email or other off-site means such as the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS), and ask for it to be reposted to the appropriate discussion board. This is a voluntary act and should not be abused or used to excess." So you want my reason for my unblock in the unblock template changed, correct? Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 13:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You need to address your abusive sockpuppetry after your initial block. You'll want to note that you've gone six months without block evasion (note: this will be validated) and are therefore applying under WP:SO. You'll want to note that the original block was inappropriate and the overlap between the two accounts was coincidental (but that the subsequent blocks were appropriate). You'll want to note that you are willing to abide by a topic ban around zoophilia, broadly construed (or alternatively, are unwilling to accept such a topic ban), and that you'll stick to a single account going forward. Basically, assume anyone reading your request has zero context and doesn't have access to your UTRS request. --Yamla (talk) 13:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, checkuser evidence shows no recent block evasion. This will count in favour of the eventual unban request. --Yamla (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we need an unblock request template. Just fill it all in the Your reason here section. Please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in the. "Your reason here " 

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I think you largely need to put what you already said at UTRS, formatting as Yamla suggests. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Female bodybuilder enthusiast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked after six months of being blocked, which has been verified though Wikipedia:Check User, for sock puppeting. I am applying under WP:SO. My initial block was inappropriate (not checked though Wikipedia:Check User) and the overlap between the two accounts (Latitude0116 and me). However, my other bans were appropriate for sock puppeting afterwards. I have been blocked for six months and had time to go over my errors. I will never sock puppet again and identified my old sock puppets. I am willing, but not requesting, to abide by a topic ban around zoophilia, broadly construed. I will stick to Female bodybuilder enthusiast account going forward. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 11:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As per this closure, the community rejects your unblock request, as there's no consensus unblocking you would be a good thing. Sorry. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have decided to take this request to the community at large. I will be posting it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 22:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your request is being considered here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User talk:Female bodybuilder enthusiast unblock request. If you have anything to add you can post here and me or another user will post it there. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 23:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on editing mostly female bodybuilding content, history, and election topics. Mostly fbb as I've been away from editing. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Female bodybuilder enthusiast, sorry that your unblock request at AN was not accepted at this time. Would have loved to see you return to editing. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 03:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What do I do now? And I'm still being cited as being Latitude011. Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. The discussion noted that you were not cu-confirmed to Latitude0116 at that time. The main reason you were not unblocked is because most editors that commented including sysops were concerned that you used multiple accounts to evade a block for a very long time. I'll advise you to resume editing another language Wikipedia with your main account and come back after like six months with a good demonstrable track record, IMHO, your block might be lifted. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 23:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hooked: Muscle Women

[edit]
Notice

The article Hooked: Muscle Women has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Found only TV Guide listings on ProQuest and newspapers.com. No results on GNews. Regular Google search yielded only uploads and directory listings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Female_bodybuilder_enthusiast&oldid=1144522741"