User talk:Feildmaster/Archive 1

Nomination of 1100AD for deletion

The article 1100AD is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1100AD until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 08:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Feildmaster. You have new messages at Shirik's talk page.
Message added 08:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

1100 AD Sources

I've had a look at the sources, and I think they're probably reliable, but I also think there are editors who would disagree with me about that. As I said in the AfD, I'm not sure whether game reviews count as reliable sources. I think they probably should, depending on who is doing the reviewing, but others might disagree. It would certainly help if you can show that the reviewers are respected within the wider gaming culture. YardsGreen (talk) 06:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm glad to help. An admin will need to close the AfD, and they do that on their own schedules. Ongoing discussions are always encouraged, so how long it takes depends on how quickly discussion dies down. Quite a few other AfDs started on the same day or after have already closed, others are still going strong. Some go on for weeks. It all depends on how much discussion there is. YardsGreen (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1100AD layout

I respect your opinion, but the Manual of Style is the rulebook for laying out articles. It's what we have to follow, regardless of opinion. --Teancum (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of those articles before. However anyone is free to nominate an article for deletion, so if you feel these should be under the same scrutiny, please do so. Stating that other stuff exists is not a basis for keeping the article, but rather is reason to nominate others a person feels doesn't meet Wikipedia's standard criteria. Please don't shoot the messenger here. I don't make the rules, I just follow them. If you don't like how something is going, I'd suggest taking it up with an administrator. --Teancum (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1100ad-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1100ad-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1100ad-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1100ad-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]