User talk:Fcstu 2000113193

Message me...

If you just want to say hi, or ask how my day is going.
If you need assistance.

If I don't respond, it means I'm not in the mood to talk. However, do not message me constantly as a means to get my attention. I will only ignore you more, and get your message deleted.

Don't message me...

If you're just going to annoy me.
If you're going to intrude in one of my conversations. This is considered unwelcoming, not to mention, rude. The only time I'll accept it is if you keep it relevant to the topic being talked about.
If you're going to come at me because I make edits that I find helpful and you do not. This will lead to nonstop arguing that I will eventually get fed up with. I will take to the administrator's noticeboard to report you for this reason if you do not comply.

Also, if I remove a message from my talk page, do not keep on repeatedly restoring the aforementioned message as it annoys me and wastes my time. I'm doing it for a reason.

Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 16:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fcstu 2000113193, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Max Schneider did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Mathglot (talk) 23:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hi Fcstu 2000113193! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Nicki Minaj that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. WikiVirusC^(talk) 15:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Please take a read at WP:DEFCAT before re-adding wrong categories to articles about countries. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted all of you recent edits, since they were incorrect and unhelpful categorisation. Please stop. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excusez-moi?

User:Fcstu_2000113193/and now, the moment yall have all been waiting for.

Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what categories are for. Read WP:DEFCAT as already explained. Also,

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi. Just wanted to let you know that edit summaries like "FIGHT B***HES FIGHT" aren’t very helpful for summarising edits. Try and say what you’re doing in your edit in future summaries. Thanks. SK2242 (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Laguerre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marie Laguerre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, and I apologise. Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

Mass reverting one user where it is not obvious vandalism and leaving no edit summary is disruptive. I suggest you stop. TAXIDICAE💰 19:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a threat? Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 19:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, but if you continue to do so, I will request a block of your account given your inappropriate, disruptive and combative behavior. TAXIDICAE💰 19:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's a threat. Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan on lifting this block if I appeal even with a compelling reason as to why? Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you submit a good reason an administrator other than the blocking one will review it. Canterbury Tail talk 19:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fcstu 2000113193 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was recently warned for inserting incorrect information by incorrectly adding categories to certain articles for countries, and I understood it. I have disregarded the warning and proceeded to war with the editor who rollbacked my edits. I am positive that I can persuade the administration that the block is not needed
a.) to protect Wikipedia from damage or disruption;
b.) because I understand why I was blocked;
c.) Instead of causing any more damage or disruption, I will instead make valuable contributions. and no, im not saying any of this just because, i actually mean what i say?

Decline reason:

You've made it amply clear that you're not here to improve the encyclopedia. We're not providing a platform for vendettas imported from perceived conflicts on other sites. Acroterion (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

anyone? must i be appealing to myself? Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We're volunteers, don't expect snappy responses.

Your "appeal" above gives no indication that you have taken anything seriously - "I have disregarded the warning and proceeded to war with the editor who rollbacked my edits." is far from a compelling reason as to why you should be unblocked.

Furthermore, you're specifically blocked because your first edit to your userpage declared enmity against another user, who has had no interactions with you. Care to explain that? Acroterion (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"you're specifically blocked because your first edit to your userpage declared enmity against another user, who has had no interactions with you." but that was a while ago so i dont understand why am i getting blocked for it now? Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 23:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's been noticed, and it's a personal attack. You're still not explaining yourself. Acroterion (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I put that there because the user was acting aggressively towards another user (who is my friend), along with a few other users one of whom were staff, on another platform. If I post personal attacks then there is a reason behind me doing it. Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And that's why you're blocked. You may not use this platform to behave aggressively toward other users. 00:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Acroterion (talk)

But this block was for something I have done in the past. So, to reiterate, what the fuck kind of sense does it make to block someone two weeks later because of something they have done which should have been noticed two weeks ago. Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've made it amply clear that you're not here to help us to improve the encyclopedia project, and I'm declining your unblock request on the basis of your wholly inappropriate responses. Acroterion (talk) 00:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to add onto this, "personal attacks" were not the only reason why i have been given an indefinite; i was edit warring (especially with staff) and changed the revisions of pages by my preference (i.e. adding wrong categories). all i can guarantee is that i understand what i have been blocked for and i respect y'all's decision if y'all do not wish to unblock me anyways. Fcstu 2000113193 (talk) 00:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 (2)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fcstu 2000113193 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was recently warned for inserting incorrect information by incorrectly adding categories to certain articles for countries, and I understood it. I have disregarded the warning and proceeded to war with the editor who rollbacked my edits. I am positive that I can persuade the administration that the block is not needed
a.) to protect Wikipedia from damage or disruption;
b.) because I understand why I was blocked;
c.) Instead of causing any more damage or disruption, I will instead make valuable contributions. and no, im not saying any of this just because, i actually mean what i say?

Decline reason:

Now a global block and a checkuser block. Also TPA revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not only should this unblock request be denied, they need to be globally locked for this: [1]. RickinBaltimore (talk) 00:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User is back and wants another block

@Jpgordon:@RickinBaltimore: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/ClassroomVoiceLevels

FMSky (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back again and edit warring on Bibi Bourelly: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:AgentAnimate_2021 FMSky (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marie Laguerre

Hello, Fcstu 2000113193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marie Laguerre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]