User talk:Fbooth

Welcome!

Hello, Fbooth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 22:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 4

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Brand. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Onorem 15:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afd Nominations

Hi, I noticed you nominating some articles for deletion via AFD. Many of the recent nominations were incomplete. AFD is a three step process and it looks like you only completed the first step. See WP:AFD for details. Also, there might be more efficient processes than AFD for some of the articles. So you might want to read WP:CSD which defines the criteria for speedy deletion. But I certainly don't want to discourage your activities. The articles that I looked at that you tagged so far should unquestionably be deleted, and the more people patrolling to keep nonsense off Wikipedia, the better. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. - Aagtbdfoua 15:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because the article's creator went ahead and created the AfD page for Spotbowl with a defense of the article, I've listed that one for you. Please feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spotbowl if you wish. BryanG^(talk) 07:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you also did not complete the AfDs for Goople and ANINA. In fact in both these cases, a speedy delete tag, {{db-empty}} and {{db-spam}} respectively, would have been appropriate. You may also want to use the prod mechanism. But above all, keep up the good work of new-page patrolling. -- RHaworth 18:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Customer Reference Management

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Customer Reference Management, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MKoltnow 17:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page George W. Bush on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dust Filter 02:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to UBank has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cflm001 (Talk) 12:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John McCain has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John McCain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 07:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created, John mccain fallacy, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Joe the Plumber. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pinkadelica ^{Say it...} 07:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. — Becksguy (talk) 08:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of UBank

I have nominated UBank, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UBank. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Moondyne 14:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for advertising or self-promoting in violation of our conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.