User talk:Fblan001

Welcome!

Hello, Fblan001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Online furies fanclub at animekida.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ArcAngel (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Online furies fanclub at thefuries.webs.com

A tag has been placed on Online furies fanclub at thefuries.webs.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ArcAngel (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aoi Bungaku has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://http://thefuries.webs.com/animeaj.htm (matching the regex rule \bwebs\.com\b).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animekida

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animekida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Animekida. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References in articles must be to reliable sources. Wikipedia, which anyone can edit, is a highly unreliable source, and should never be used for references. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DJ rene at Miami Round Table show.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DJ rene at Miami Round Table show.jpg, which you've attributed to Electric Avenue. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ALH (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lorenzo the cat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lorenzo the cat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epicgenius^{(talk to me • see my contributions)} 13:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Anime Kida 13:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

this article is not about any normal pet, it is about an internationally recognized feline model. This cat is a cultural icon in miami and I believe it deserves a place here. It deserves a place same a Felix the cat and other rewound characters. The cat has its own talk show, fashion line, has appeared on the new york time, Washington post, many talk shows and more.

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keloid Removal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trauma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply : I have fixed the disambigous link, This is still a work in progress and I will be expanding on this article very soon after I do some further research, But I have removed the Trauma Link, I appreciate your help.

Speedy deletion nomination of Magdalena la pelua

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Magdalena la pelua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ng Pey Shih 07 (talk) 20:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional material

I have removed material you added to Abdominoplasty, Trans-umbilical breast augmentation, and Buttock augmentation because it seems promotional in nature and is not backed by reliable medical sources. Such material violates WP:Promotion and WP:Medrs. Please read these policies and comment on why you feel the material is justified according to policy before reverting again. In order to avoid redundancy, please don't reply here. Rather, please reply at Talk:Abdominoplasty#Promotional_material. --Taylornate (talk) 03:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I share Taylornate's concerns. These sources are nowhere near compliance with MEDRS

Hello, Fblan001. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Electric_Avenue_(store), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. This is in reference to your edits at Electric_Avenue_(store), Abdominoplasty, Trans-umbilical breast augmentation, and Buttock augmentation. Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for brand promotion.--Taylornate (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another WP:COI Warning

Stop adding external links to articles that point to web sites you are affiliated with, as you did with Anime [1] and Buttock augmentation [2]. This sort of editing is blatantly inappropriate, as explained in previous warnings. Wikipedia is not an appropriate venue for "brand management", as you call it on your user page.--Taylornate (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for advertising or brand management in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fblan001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

wont happen again,employer required me to do it, already showed him this and he wont be giving me any more trouble, Anime kida was sold so I have no further need to post things in wiki, been part of wiki since 2001 Anime Kida 14:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You had no need before; your additions clearly contravened our policies against promotional editing and you were warned several times. In reviewing your history and deleted edits, you clearly have a fundamental misunderstanding of the platform and appear to be easily swayed by your employer. Mr. Todd's assessment seems correct. Kuru (talk) 14:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unfortunately, I conflicted with Kuru. I was attempting to leave an unblock successful message of "Unblocked on the WP:ROPE principle, since you've been around for a while. Let me remind you that you're basically in a Damocles type of situation: one more instance of spamming will likely result in a restoration of the block, and you're far less likely to get unblocked a second time." Nyttend (talk) 14:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend (talk) Like I said this incident wont happen again, I have contributed a good number of things that were not for employee bases, And if it happens again I know very well that I wont be able to escape conviction, Please return my privileges, I've been part of Wiki for as long as I remember.

{{unblock|reason=like I said this incident wont happen again, I have contributed a good number of things that were not for employee bases, And if it happens again I know very well that I wont be able to escape conviction, Please return my privileges, I've been part of Wiki for as long as I remember Plus Kuru seems to believe that I deserve one last chance. Yes Electric Avenue and The abdominoplasty ones were employee based but lorenzo, that one was for wiki's benefit. Also in future references, I am no longer associated wtih Lorenzo or Electric avenue, But I am still associated with the cosmetic surgery and with Anime Kida. Also please block edits from this IP just to be safe in case they try to edit any articles from the IP or claim to be me, 192.168.8.108 Anime Kida 17:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)}}. Anime Kida 17:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)}}.

Nytend did unblock you this morning with the caveat that there is a zero tolerance for any promotional editing. Please don't betray the trust that he has extended you. Kuru (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]