User talk:Fawwaz Alif

Fawwaz Alif, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fawwaz Alif! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Permatang Rambai) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Permatang Rambai, Fawwaz Alif!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. At the moment, it's at risk of being tagged for deletion as the information isn't verified at all. Can you please add your source?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adnan Arsal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adnan Arsal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saifudin Nasution

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Saifudin Nasution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 08:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Next Malaysian general election, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Molecule Extraction (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Golda Meir. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Golda Meir was changed by Fawwaz Alif (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950107 on 2017-12-16T07:16:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nik Mohamad Abduh Nik Abdul Aziz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nik Mohamad Abduh Nik Abdul Aziz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Saqib (talk) 08:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Malaysian general election, 2018, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Mahathir Mohamad. Molecule Extraction (talk) 02:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Malaysian general election, 2018, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudrajat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sudrajat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SkyGazer 512 ^{What will you say? / What did I do?} 14:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmad Syaikhu

Hello Fawwaz Alif,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ahmad Syaikhu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmad Syaikhu

Hello Fawwaz Alif,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ahmad Syaikhu for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm MTKASH. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Please only create pages with reliable sources MTKASH^{TALK Contribs} 14:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Barisan Nasional, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Molecule Extraction (talk) 07:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Republican Party (United States), you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically File:1965 Jeremy Thorpe.jpg, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 08:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2016 United States presidential election, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 06:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

A majority of your edits have been disruptive, compare warnings above. Today, you just returned to 2016 United States presidential election and removed the same content as you were warned about immediately above, again with no explanation. It's enough. You have been blocked indefinitely. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 12:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen no Fawwaz Alif (talk) 03:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Bishonen | tålk 03:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fawwaz Alif (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

its not me who edited the page, forgive me please, i will protect my accoubt better

Decline reason:

We generally do not unblock accounts that claim to be compromised. PhilKnight (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fawwaz Alif (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]