User talk:Fatka
| Userpage | User Talk | Projects & Interests | User Books | Sandbox | Resources |
|---|
Leave me comments on my edits here. Fatka (talk · contribs)
Request for Review of Quantum Knowledge Graphs
[edit]I am Co-PI on a proposal to the National Science Foundation's Proto-OKN project (https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2023/nsf23571/nsf23571.htm). We are developing knowledge graphs for quantum computing, networks, and sensing, and intend to use data from Wikipedia to inform our graphs. I am reaching out to see if you or your colleagues might, assuming we're awarded the grant, be interested in evaluating knowledge graphs developed by our team, for accuracy with Wikipedia content, as user evaluation is a required component of the NSF grant.
If it helps, we are encouraged in the proposal to include budget lines for evaluators, so that their time will be paid. In the event we're awarded the grant, I'd be happy to discuss options for compensation.
At this stage, all that we would need is filling in the template below which was provided on the NSF grant announcement linked above:
"If the proposal submitted by Dr. Barry Smith entitled "Quantum Understanding through Accessible Knowledge Graphs (QUARK)" is selected for funding by NSF, it is my intent to collaborate as detailed in the Project Description of the proposal."
Where in this case, the details described in the project description relevant to Wikipedia would be as evaluators of the content of our knowledge graphs for accuracy against Wikipedia.
Happy to talk more if you're interested; hope to hear from you soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crayon Logic (talk • contribs) 00:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
FA review?
[edit]Hello,
I noticed that you are involved with the physics articles on Wikipedia, and I was wondering if you could help me out. Right now, I'm working to bring the article AdS/CFT correspondence to FA status. So far, people have had many good suggestions and many positive things to say about the article, but I'm having trouble getting people to support or oppose the nomination.
I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it and tell us your thoughts at this page. Please note that you do not have to be an expert on the subject. The article has already been checked quite carefully by other reviewers, and at this point, I'm just looking for people who can check that it meets the FA criteria.
Please let me know if you're interested. Thanks. Polytope24 (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. I'll give it a read this evening. - Fatka (talk · contribs) 15:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Request to review an article
[edit]Hi, I have created and developed a page on Clebsch-Gordan coefficient for SU(3). This is my first article. The article is a bit technical and require expert opinion. It will be really helpful if you find some time to take a look at the article and propose any improvements if necessary. Thank you. Arkadipta Sarkar (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Arkadipta Sarkar