User talk:FatClemenza

Thank you for experimenting with the page Barry Bonds on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User talk:Omicronpersei8. It may be seen as vandalism. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit at Douche

Please stop. If you continue to insert images into articles with the intent to provoke, offend, or push a POV agenda, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Badger151 19:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Giambi

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Badger151 03:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FatClemenza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did vandalize wikipedia for a while, yes, but I have since made only positive edits on my IP account and under another name and if I make even one vandalism I will accept a permanent ban, but I think I should be allowed to edit again. I even made positive edits on this name and I think that I deserve another chance.

Decline reason:

Please file another request once you have provided the information requested below. -- Netsnipe ► 15:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is the case, what is this IP accoumt and this other name? // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 04:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]