User talk:Fascinum
Welcome!
|
December 2016
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edits you made to Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) and Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Statement of Russian president on Budapest Memorandum can't be considered as POV according to article 80.4 of Russian constitution: "As the head of the State the President of the Russian Federation represent the Russian Federation within the country and in international relations." Fascinum (talk) 21:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- The RF position has been adequately summarised for the lead of the article already. Your additional content is WP:UNDUE for the lead and uses a WP:PRIMARY video source in Russian without any translation (and is from a personal account on YouTube). Added to that, the grammar is appalling. If you have arguments for the inclusion, take them to the talk page of the article and explain your position there. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- The RF position on Budapest memorandum is provided by several citations with a reference only for a latter one. Moreover, statements of Russian president are superior to statements of Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs or Prime minister. I said enough. You can discuss grammar somewhere else. I'll certainly do everything you advised to stop your desperate edit war, when I have free time. For now, it is simpler to undo your deletions. Good luck with blocking.Fascinum (talk) 22:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Fascinum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Referring to this edit summary. Toddst1 (talk) 22:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Well done, Fascinum! Your initial efforts as an editor are superlative. Suggestion: read WP:AGF and try opening a thread on the relevant talk pages. Wikipedia relies on collaborative editing and discussion, not abusive edit summaries. Stop treating this project as a WP:BATTLEGROUND and follow WP:BRD. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- "Well done, Fascinum!" - such sarcasm is considered as a "personal attack", isn't it? Suggestion: watch "Desperate housewives" series. Fascinum (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The rationale has been explained on your talk page. If you want input from other editors, take it to the article's talk page as you've been asked to do per WP:BRD. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Fascinum reported by User:Iryna Harpy (Result: ). Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring on Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Articles about Ukraine, Russia and Eastern Europe are covered by discretionary sanctions
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.